ISSN: 0443-511
e-ISSN: 2448-5667
Usuario/a
Idioma
Herramientas del artículo
Envíe este artículo por correo electrónico (Inicie sesión)
Enviar un correo electrónico al autor/a (Inicie sesión)
Tamaño de fuente

Open Journal Systems

Predicción de mortalidad en COVID-19. Comparación entre dos escalas / COVID-19 mortality prediction. Comparison between two scales

Alberto Arce-Zepeda, Armando Geovanni Araiza-Aguirre

Resumen


Resumen

Introducción: el pronóstico y mortalidad en pacientes con COVID-19 son variables. Las escalas NEWS2 (National Early Warning Score) y REMS (Rapid Emergency Medicine Score) pueden ser utilizadas rápidamente al ingreso hospitalario para predecir mortalidad, sin embargo no se encuentran estudios que comparen su rendimiento predictivo en nuestra población.

Objetivo: comparar las escalas NEWS2 y REMS para predecir mortalidad en pacientes con COVID-19.

Material y métodos: cohorte retrospectiva con 361 pacientes. Se recabaron las variables para calcular las escalas NEWS2 y REMS y el motivo de egreso hospitalario. El valor predictivo para mortalidad se analizó mediante curva COR, estableciendóse área bajo la curva (AUC) con intervalos de confianza al 95% (IC95%). Se determinó el punto de corte (PC) con la mejor sensibilidad y especificidad, valor predictivo positivo (VPP) y valor predictivo negativo (VPN), además de riesgo relativo (RR) con IC95%.

Resultados: las AUC de NEWS2 y REMS fueron de 0.929 (IC95%: 0.903 - 0.956) y 0.913 (IC95%: 0.884 - 0.943), respectivamente. El PC de la escala NEWS2 fue de 8 puntos, con sensibilidad de 87.8% y especificidad de 82.1%, el VPP de 69.7% y el VPN de 93.5%; mientras que de la escala REMS fue de 7 puntos, con sensibilidad de 83.5% y especificidad de 83.7%, el VPP de 70.5% y el VPN de 91.6%. Un total de 8 o más puntos en la escala NEWS2 presentan un RR de 10.74 (IC95%: 6.4 - 18.03), y REMS de 7 o más puntos un RR de 8.36 (IC95%: 5.36 - 13.02)

Conclusión: ambas pruebas presentaron buena capacidad discriminativa para predecir mortalidad, siendo mejor de acuerdo con AUC y RR en la escala NEWS2.

 

Abstract

Background: The prognosis and mortality in patients with COVID-19 are variable. The NEWS2 (National Early Warning Score) and REMS (Rapid Emergency Medicine Score) scales can be used quickly at hospital admission to predict mortality, no studies have been found that compare their predictive performance in our population.

Objective: To compare NEWS2 and REMS to predict mortality in patients with COVID-19.

Material and methods: Retrospective cohort with 361 patients. The variables were collected to calculate the NEWS2 and REMS scales and the reason for hospital discharge. The predictive value for mortality was analyzed using the ROC curve, establishing the area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The cut-off point (PC) with the best sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), as well as relative risk (RR) with 95% CI.

Results: The AUC of NEWS2 and REMS were 0.929 (95% CI: 0.903-0.956) and 0.913 (95% CI: 0.884-0.943), respectively. The PC of the NEWS2 scale was 8 points, with sensitivity 87.8% and specificity 82.1%, PPV 69.7% and NPV 93.5% and of the REMS scale of 7 points, with sensitivity 83.5% and specificity 83.7%, PPV 70.5% and NPV 91.6%. 8 or more points on the NEWS2 scale presenting a RR of 10.74 (95% CI: 6.4-18.03), and REMS 7 or more points RR 8.36 (95% CI: 5.36-13.02)

Conclusion: Both tests presented good discriminative ability to predict mortality, being better according to AUC and RR in the NEWS2 scale.

 


Palabras clave


Infecciones por Coronavirus; Mortalidad Hospitalaria; Medicina de Emergencia / Coronavirus Infections; Hospital Mortality; Emergency Medicine

Texto completo:

PDF

Referencias


Velázquez R. Historia de las infecciones por coronavirus y epidemiología de la infección por SARS-CoV-2. Rev Mex Traspl. 2020;9(S2):s149-s159.

 

World Health Organization. This statement is updated on an ongoing basis, in response to evolving events and common media queries. [Internet]. 2020. Disponible en: www.who.int/ news-room/detail/27-04-2020-who-timeline---covid-19.

 

World Health Organization. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. [Internet]. 2021 [citado Mayo del 2021]. Disponible en: covid19.who.int.

 

Ramiro M. Epidemiología del SARS-CoV-2. Acta Pediatr Mex. 2020;41(Supl 1):S8-S14.

 

World Health Organization. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. [Internet]. 2021 [citado Mayo del 2021]. Disponible en: covid19.who.int.

 

Secretaría de Salud. Lineamiento Estandarizado Para La Vigilancia Epidemiológica y por Laboratorio de La Enfermedad Respiratoria Viral. Enero de 2021.

 

Romero S, Saavedra J, Zamarron E, Perez O, Figueroa A, Guerrero M, et al. Protocolo de atención para COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) de la Sociedad Mexicana de Medicina de Emergencias. Sociedad Mexicana de Medicina de Emergencia. 2020.

 

Ji D, Zhang D, Xu J, Chen Z, Yang T, Zhao P, et al. Prediction for Progression Risk in Patients With COVID- 19 Pneumonia: The CALL Score. cid 2020:71.

 

Huespe I, Carboni-Bisso I, Di Stefano S. COVID-19 Severity Index: A predictive score for hospitalized patients, Medicina Intensiva.

 

Cheng P, Wu H, Yang J. Pneumonia scoring systems for severe COVID‑19: which one is better. Virol J. 2021;18:33.

 

Liu S. Five rapid scoring systems for predicting the mortality of severe novel coronavirus disease patient. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.11.076.

 

Hai H, Ni Y, Yanru Q. Predictive value of 5 early warning scores for critical COVID-19 patients. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020;9:1–8.

 

Özdemir S, Şeyma-Akça H, Algın A, Altunok I, Emre-Eroğlu S. Effectiveness of the rapid emergency medicine score and the rapid acute physiology score in prognosticating mortality in patients presenting to the emergency department with COVID-19 symptoms. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine; 2021.

 

Hu H, Yao N, Qiu Y. Comparing Rapid Scoring Systems in Mortality Prediction of Critically Ill Patients With Novel Coronavirus Disease. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2020;27(6).

 

Myrstad M, Ihle-Hansen H, Aune A, Andersen E, Nygård S, Tveit A, et al. National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) on admission predicts severe disease and in-hospital mortality from Covid-19 – a prospective cohort study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020;28:66.

 

Olsson T, Terent A, Lind L. Rapid Emergency Medicine score: a new prognostic tool for in hospital mortality in nonsurgical emergency department patients. J Intern Med. 2004;255(5): 579-87.

 

Olsson T, Lind L. Comparison of the rapid emergency medicine score and APACHE II in nonsurgical emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10(10):1040-8.

 

Royal College of Physicians. National Early Warning Score (NEWS) Standardising the assessment of acute-illness severity in the NHS. Report of a working party. London: RCP; 2012.

 

Royal College of Physicians. National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2; Standardising the assessment of acute-illness severity in the NHS. Update report of a working party. London: RCP; 2012.

 

L Yan. Effectiveness of 6 Scores in Predicting the Death Risk of COVID-19. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2021.

 

Pugazhvannan CR. National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) to predict poor outcome in hospitalised COVID-19 patients in India. PLOSONE. 2021.

 

Kaeley N. Utility of early warning scores to predict mortality in COVID-19 patients: A retrospective observational study. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2021.

 

Hai H. Comparing Rapid Scoring Systems in Mortality Prediction of Critically Ill Patients With Novel Coronavirus Disease. Acad Emerg Med. 2020.

 

Bas B. Assessment of The Relationship of REMS and MEWS Scores with Prognosis in Patients Diagnosed with Covid-19 Admitted to the Emergency Department. BMJ. 2021.

 


Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.