ISSN: 0443-511
e-ISSN: 2448-5667
Usuario/a
Idioma
Herramientas del artículo
Envíe este artículo por correo electrónico (Inicie sesión)
Enviar un correo electrónico al autor/a (Inicie sesión)
Tamaño de fuente

Open Journal Systems

Evaluación de la calidad de recuperación anestésica en pacientes postoperados / Evaluation of the quality of anesthetic recovery in postoperative patients

Laura Mariana Navarro-Benítez, Lucero Dalila García-Posada, Isette Yunue Landeros-Navarro, Víctor Manuel López-Garcés

Resumen


Resumen

Introducción: la atención sanitaria integral incluye la satisfacción en la atención del paciente y la calidad de servicios médicos. Se han empleado instrumentos con alta precisión para evaluar la calidad de recuperación anestésica (CRA), como el cuestionario validado QoR-15, el cual considera aspectos sobre emocionalidad, bienestar físico y psicológico, dolor y autonomía física.

Objetivo: evaluar la CRA en pacientes postoperados sometidos a anestesia.

Material y métodos: estudio observacional, descriptivo, transversal, realizado de marzo a agosto de 2022. Se incluyeron 80 pacientes de 18 a 70 años sometidos a procedimiento anestésico y a quienes se les aplicó el cuestionario de calidad anestésica QoR-15 a las 24 horas de postoperados. Se empleó estadística descriptiva de acuerdo con la prueba de Shapiro-Wilk. Las variables cuantitativas se analizaron con U de Mann-Whitney y las cualitativas con chi cuadrada; se consideró significativo un valor de p < 0.05.

Resultados: los 80 pacientes obtuvieron 122.06 (52-147) puntos en el cuestionario QoR-15 y su CRA se consideró como buena; en los pacientes sometidos a técnicas anestésicas regionales la CRA fue excelente en 42.5% y 10% tuvieron anestesia general balanceada, p = 0.011. 

Conclusión: la CRA fue mayor con las técnicas anestésicas regionales. La evaluación de la calidad mediante herramientas validadas permite su evaluación objetiva y hacer seguimiento del proceso de atención en los servicios médicos.

 

Abstract 

Background: Comprehensive health care includes the evaluation of satisfaction in patient care and the quality of medical services. High-precision instruments have been used to assess the quality of recovery after anesthesia (QoR), such as the QoR-15 questionnaire, a validated and accurate assessment tool that considers aspects of emotionality, physical and psychological well-being, pain, and autonomy.

Objective: To assess QoR in postoperative patients who underwent anesthesia.

Material and methods: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study, carried out from March to August 2022. 80 patients from 18 to 70 years who underwent an anesthetic procedure and to which the anesthetic quality QoR-15 questionnaire was administered 24 hours after surgery were included. Descriptive statistics were performed according to the Shapiro-Wilk test. For quantitative variables it was used Mann-Whitney U, and for qualitative variables chi-squared; it was considered significant a value of p < 0.05.

Results: The 80 patients obtained a QoR-15 score of 122.06 (52-147), and their QoR was considered good. Anesthetic recovery quality in patients undergoing regional anesthetic techniques was excellent in 42.5% and 10% had balanced general anesthesia, p = 0.011. 

Conclusions: QoR was higher with regional anesthetic techniques. Quality assessment through validated tools allows objective evaluation and monitoring of the care process in medical services.


Palabras clave


Calidad de la Atención de Salud; Recuperación; Satisfacción del Paciente; Anestesia Regional; Anestesia General / Quality of Healthcare; Recovery; Patient Satisfaction; Anesthesia, Conduction; Anesthesia, General

Texto completo:

PDF

Referencias


Tristán-Martínez P, Doubova SV, Sauceda-Valenzuela AL. Calidad de atención en pacientes con cáncer de próstata atendidos en México. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2022;60(3):275-82. Disponible en: http://revistamedica.imss.gob.mx/editorial/index.php/revista_medica/article/view/4402/4374.

Arriaga-Dávila JJ, Pérez-Rodríguez G, Borrayo-Sánchez G. Dimensiones de calidad enfocadas en el protocolo de atención código infarto. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2017;55(3):382-7. Disponible en: http://revistamedica.imss.gob.mx/editorial/index.php/revista_medica/article/view/797/2100.

Recart A. Medicina perioperatoria ¿El futuro de la anestesiología? Rev Chil Anestesia. 2018;47(3):166-75. doi: 10.25237/revchilanestv47n03.03.

Porter M. ¿What Is Value in Health Care? N Engl J Med. 2010;363(26):2477-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1011024.

Tiret L, Desmonts J, Hatton F, et al. Complications associated with anesthesia: A prospective survey in France. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1986;33:336-44. doi: 10.1007/bf03010747.

Beaussier M, Raucoules-Aimé M. Métodos de evaluación y escalas de los estadios del despertar. EMC Anestesia-Reanimación. 2016;42(2):1-13. doi: 10.1016/S1280-4703(16)77452-4.

Kluivers K, Riphagen I, Vierhout M, et al. Systematic review on recovery specific quality-of-life instruments. Surgery. 2008;143(2):206-15. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.08.017.

Myles P, Hunt J, Nightingale C, et al. Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults. Anesth Analg. 1999;88(1):83-90. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199901000-00016.

Stark P, Myles P, Burke J. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score. Anesthesiology. 2013;118(6):1332-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289b84b.

Gornall B, Myles P, Smith C, et al. Measurement of quality of recovery using the QoR-40: A quantitative systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(2):161-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet014.

Myles P, Weitkamp B, Jones K, et al. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: The QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000;84(1):11-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366.

Kleif J, Gögenur I. Severity classification of the quality of recovery-15 score-An observational study. J Surg Res. 2018;225:101-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.12.040.

Campfort M, Cayla C, Lasocki S, et al. Early quality of recovery according to QoR-15 score is associated with one-month postoperative complications after elective surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2022;78:110638. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110638.

Guimarães-Pereira L, Costa M, Sousa G, et al. Quality of recovery after anaesthesia measured with QoR-40: A prospective observational study. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2016;66(4):369-75. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.11.010.

Chazapis M, Walker E, Rooms M, et al. Measuring quality of recovery-15 after day case surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2016;116(2):241-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev413.

Blanchard C, Labrecque M, Ruckdeschel J, et al. Physician behaviors, patient perceptions, and patient characteristics as predictors of satisfaction of hospitalized adult cancer patients. Cancer. 1990;65(1):186-92. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19900101)65:1<186: aid-cncr2820650136>3.0.co;2-4.

Moro E, Nóbrega M, Gouvêa M, et al. Quality of recovery from anesthesia in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery of the lower limbs. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2016;66(6):642-50. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2015.05.001.

Myles P, McLeod A, Hunt J, et al. Sex differences in speed of emergence and quality of recovery after anesthesia: Cohort study. BMJ. 2001 24;322(7288):710-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7288.710.

Buchanan F, Myles P, Cicuttini F. Effect of patient sex on general anesthesia and recovery. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106(6):832-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer094.

Kleif J, Edwards H, Sort R, et al. Translation and validation of the Danish version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015;59(7):912-20. doi: 10.1111/aas.12525.

Marinho R, Lusquinhos J, Carvalho B et al. Calidad de la recuperación después de la cirugía para el tratamiento del cáncer. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2018;65(8):426-33. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2018.04.008.

Christelis N, Wallace S, Sage C, et al. An enhanced recovery after surgery program for hip and knee arthroplasty. Med J Aust. 2015;202(7):363-8. doi: 10.5694/mja14.00601.

De los Ríos J, Cordero I, Pérez G et al. Satisfacción de la recuperación anestésica postoperatoria, según escala en pacientes con anestesia general y neuroaxial. Rev Mex Anest. 2017;40(4):264-72.

Cho H, Kwon H, Song S, et al. Quality of postoperative recovery after upper-arm vascular surgery for hemodialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease: A prospective comparison of cervical epidural anesthesia vs general anesthesia. Medicine. 2020;99(3):18773. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018773.

Nair G, Wong D, Chan E, et al. Mode of anesthesia and quality of recovery after breast surgery: A case series of 100 patients. Cureus. 2021;13(3):e13822. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13822.

Pogatzki-Zahn E, Segelcke D, Schug S. Postoperative pain from mechanisms to treatment. Pain Rep. 2017;2(2):e588. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000588.

Young A, Buvanendran A. Recent advances in multimodal analgesia. Anesthesiol Clin. 2012;30(1):91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2011.12.002.

Gan T, Belani K, Bergese S, et al. Fourth Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2020;131(2):411-48. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004833.

Fearon K, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: A consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr. 2005;24(3):466-77. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.02.002.

Kleif J, Waage J, Christensen K, et al. Systematic review of the QoR-15 score, a patient- reported outcome measure measuring quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120(1):28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.013.

Léger M, Campfort M, Cayla C, et al. Validation of an alternative French version of the Quality of Recovery-15 Score: the FQoR-15. Br J Anaesth. 2020;125(4):345-47. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.05.052.

Shahsavari H, Ghane G, Ghiyasvandian S, et al. Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the quality of recovery-15 questionnaire. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021;5(1):108. doi: 0.1186/s41687-021-00351-9.

Myles PS. Structural validity of the 15-item quality of recovery scale. Br J Anaesth. 2021;127(4):138-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.07.006.

Myles P, Shulman M, Reilly J, et al. Measurement of quality of recovery after surgery using the 15-item quality of recovery scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2022;128(6):1029-39. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.009.

Myles P, Myles D. An Updated Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the QoR-15 Scale. Anesthesiology. 2021;135(5):934-5. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003977.

 


Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.