ISSN: 0443-511
e-ISSN: 2448-5667
Usuario/a
Idioma
Herramientas del artículo
Envíe este artículo por correo electrónico (Inicie sesión)
Enviar un correo electrónico al autor/a (Inicie sesión)
Tamaño de fuente

Open Journal Systems

Seguimiento del paciente con marcapasos: interrogatorio y programación básica / Follow-up of the patient with pacemakers: Interrogation and basic programming

Gustavo Inzunza-Cervantes, José de Jesús Díaz-Dávalos, Arturo Flores-Anguiano, José Manuel Ornelas-Aguirre, Isabel Cristina Peralta-Figueroa, Verónica Zazueta-Armenta

Resumen


Resumen

Los marcapasos permanentes son una modalidad terapéutica de uso frecuente. Su empleo ha tenido un gran impacto en la morbimortalidad y calidad de vida de los pacientes con alteraciones del ritmo cardiaco, observándose en las últimas décadas un incremento exponencial. El empleo de esta estrategia presenta diferentes fases, que inician con la indicación de la estimulación, la selección del sistema de marcapaso apropiado, el procedimiento de implantación, la programación inicial y el seguimiento posterior, en la cual el seguimiento a lo largo de la vida útil del dispositivo es un pilar fundamental y determinante de la eficacia y seguridad de esta modalidad terapéutica. La presente revisión busca proporcionar una actualización clara y estructurada de los aspectos fundamentales a considerar en el seguimiento de todo paciente portador de marcapasos. El seguimiento del paciente con marcapasos debe seguir un protocolo completo, sistemático y periódico, evaluando aspectos y parámetros relacionado con el paciente y el marcapaso, con la finalidad de garantizar un funcionamiento adecuado y seguro del dispositivo adaptado a la persona.

 

Abstract

Permanent pacemakers are a frequently used therapeutic modality. Its use has had a great impact on the morbidity and mortality and quality of life of patients with heart rhythm disturbances, with an exponential increase observed in recent decades. The use of this strategy presents different phases, in which follow-up throughout the useful life of the device is a fundamental and determinant pillar of the efficacy and safety of this therapeutic modality. This review seeks to provide a clear and structured update of the fundamental aspects to consider in the follow-up of all patients with pacemakers. The follow-up of the patient with a pacemaker must follow a complete, systematic and periodic protocol, evaluating aspects and parameters related to the patient and the pacemaker, in order to ensure the proper and safe operation of the device adapted to the person.


Palabras clave


Marcapaso Artificial; Frecuencia Cardiaca; Telemetría; Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica; Ritmo / Pacemaker, Artificial; Heart Rate; Telemetry; Electrical Stimulation Therapy; Rhythm

Texto completo:

PDF

Referencias


Hurtado Nazal C, Araneda V. A, Zamora H M, et al. Cuidado perioperatorio de pacientes portadores de dispositivos electrónicos cardíacos implantables. Rev Chil Cir. 2017;69(1):77– 83. doi: 10.1016/j.rchic.2016.06.001.

Aktaa S, Abdin A, Arbelo E, et al. European Society of Cardiology Quality Indicators for the care and outcomes of cardiac pacing: Developed by the Working Group for Cardiac Pacing Quality Indicators in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Card. Europace, 2022;24(1):165–72. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab193.

Lim WY, Prabhu S, Schilling RJ. Implantable cardiac electronic devices in the elderly population. Arrhythmia Electrophysiol Rev 2019;8(2):143–6. doi: 10.15420/aer.2019.3.4.

Neuenschwander JF, Peacock WF, Migeed M, et al. Safety and efficiency of emergency department interrogation of cardiac devices. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2016;3(4):239–44. doi: 10.15441/ceem.15.118.

Udo EO, Van Hemel NM, Zuithoff NPA, et al. Pacemaker follow-up: Are the latest guidelines in line with modern pacemaker practice? Europace. 2013;15(2):243–51. doi: 10.1093/ europace/eus310.

Rajgopal S, Kapoor A, Bajaj R, et al. CSI/IHRS practice guidelines on follow-up of patients with permanent pacemakers: a Cardiology Society of India/Indian Heart Rhythm Society task force report on practice guidelines on follow-up of patients with permanent pacemakers. Indian Heart J. 2012; 64(Suppl2):S12-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2012.11.002.

Costelloe CM, Murphy WA Jr, Gladish GW, et al. Radiography of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(6):1252-8. doi: 10.2214/ AJR.12.864.

SEC Working Group for the 2021 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy and the SEC Guidelines Committee. Comments on the 2021 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2022;75(5):370-4. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2021.11.015.

Shah MJ, Silka MJ, Silva JNA, et al. 2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients. Cardiol Young. 2021;31(11):1738-69. doi: 10.1017/ S1047951121003413.

Coombes D. Pacemaker therapy 2: Pacing functions and their role in patient care. Nurs Times 2021;117(12):29–32.

Mathew RP, Alexander T, Patel V, et al. Chest radiographs of cardiac devices (Part 1): Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices, cardiac valve prostheses and Amplatzer occluder devices. SA J Radiol. 2019 Jul 31;23(1):1730. doi: 10.4102/sajr.v23i1.1730.

Higaki A, Kawada Y, Hiasa G, et al. Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Pacemaker Lead Trajectory From Orthogonal Chest X-Rays: A Proof of Concept. Cureus. 202; 13(12):1–5. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20807.

Brixey AG, Fuss C. Innovative Cardiac Devices on Chest Imaging. J Thorac Imaging. 2017;32(6):343–57. doi: 10.1097/ RTI.0000000000000304.

Sabbagh E, Abdelfattah T, Karim MM, et al. Causes of Failure to Capture in Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillators. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2020;11(2):4013-7. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2020.110207.

Chinushi M, Tachikawa H, Chinushi Y, et al. Incorrect Holter-ECG analysis caused by the pacemaker delivering small high-frequency currents for thoracic impedance measurement. J Cardiol Cases. 2017;16(6):219–22. doi: 10.1016/j. jccase.2017.08.007.

Sampaio SMV, Craveiro NM, Darrieux F, et al. Accuracy of the pacemaker event recorder versus Holter-ECG to detect both symptomatic and asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018;29(1):154-9. doi: 10.1111/ jce.13370.

Shams P, Mehdi M, Ali J, et al. Comparing sensitivity and specificity of pacemaker ID application and cardiac rhythm management device-finder application in identifying cardiac implantable electronic device manufacturer using chest radiograph - An observational study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021;69:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102741.

Sekimoto S, Wakamatsu M, Morino A, et al. Early detection of twiddler syndrome due a congestion alert by remote monitoring. Clin Case Rep. 2017;5(6):950-3. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.979.

Lau EW. Longevity decoded: Insights from power consumption analyses into device construction and their clinical implications. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;42(4):407-22. doi: 10.1111/pace.13642.

Montgomery JA, Ellis CR. Longevity of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2018; 10(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ccep.2017.11.001.

Liu J, Wen L, Yao S, et al. Adverse clinical events caused by pacemaker battery depletion: two case reports. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Jul 23;20(1):1-5. doi: 10.1186/ s12872-020-01622-x.

Sinha SK, Chrispin J, Barth A, et al. Clinical recognition of pacemaker battery depletion and automatic reprogramming. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;40(8):969-74. doi: 10.1111/ pace.13135.

Sepúlveda López FA, Jiménez Muñoz LM, Agudelo Uribe JF, et al. Patient with an implantable cardiac electrical stimulation device. What should the anesthesiologist know? Rev colomb anestesiol. 2021;49(4):1–10. doi: 10.5554/22562087.e976.

Mulpuru SK, Madhavan M, McLeod CJ, et al. Cardiac Pacemakers: Function, Troubleshooting, and Management: Part 1 of a 2-Part Series. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(2):189–210. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.06.

Yanagisawa S, Inden Y, Watanabe R, et al. Depolarization and repolarization dynamics after His-bundle pacing: Comparison with right ventricular pacing and native ventricular conduction. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2022;27(5):1-11. doi: 10.1111/anec.12991.

Ali N, Keene D, Arnold A, et al. His Bundle Pacing: A New Frontier in the Treatment of Heart Failure. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2018;7(2):103-10. doi: 10.15420/aer.2018.6.2.

Archontakis S, Sideris K, Laina A, et al. His bundle pacing: A promising alternative strategy for anti-bradycardic pacing - report of a single-center experience. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2022; 64:77-86. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2021.10.005.

Martinez JC, Khiatah B, Jazayeri S, et al. Increased device thresholds with subsequent improvement status post-systemic therapy in a patient with multiple myeloma. HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2021;7(11):717-21. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2021.05.005.

Cronin B, Birgersdotter-Green U, Essandoh MK. Perioperative Interrogation of Boston Scientific Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices: A Guide for Anesthesiologists. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019;33(4):1076-89. doi: 10.1053/j. jvca.2018.05.005.

Glikson M, Nielsen JC, Kronborg MB, et al. Guía ESC 2021 sobre estimulación cardiaca y terapia de resincronización. Rev Esp Cardiol 2022 May;75(5):430.e1-86. doi: 10.1016/j. recesp.2021.10.025.

Swerdlow CD, Koneru JN, Gunderson B, et al. Impedance in the Diagnosis of Lead Malfunction. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020;13(2):172-86. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.008092.

Nayeri AN, Pavri BB. Abrupt increase in impedance measurements as detected via remote monitoring: What is the cause? HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2015;1(2):51-53. doi: 10.1016/j. hrcr.2014.12.001.

Chavarriaga A, Duque M, Díaz JC, et al. Electrocardiograma de superficie en pacientes con dispositivos de estimulación cardíaca. Rev Colomb Cardiol 2014;21(5):308–17. doi: 10.1016/j.rccar.2014.08.005

Galappaththige SK, Gray RA, Roth BJ. Modeling bipolar stimulation of cardiac tissue. Chaos. 2017;27(9):093920. doi: 10.1063/1.5000163.

Liu Y, Yuan X. Logic Analysis of Arrhythmia Triggered by Pacemaker Special Functions - An Educational Presentation. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;36(3):412-415. doi: 10.21470/ 1678-9741-2020-0630.36.

Biffi M, Pelargonio G, Havlicek A, et al. Pacemaker Programming, Physiologic Pacing Settings, and Clinical Outcomes in Real-world Practice: Results from the OPTI-MIND Clinical Study. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2016;7(1):2229–37. DOI: 10.19102/icrm.2016.070101.

Benezet-Mazuecos J, Iglesias JA, Manuel Rubio J, et al. Abnormal AutoCapture algorithm phenomenon after pacemaker implantation in patients with low stimulation threshold. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10(4):611-3. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.11.011.

Bertomeu-González V, Pombo M, Chimeno J,et al. Estimulación cardiaca tras pandemia de la COVID-19. Propuesta de desescalada de la Sección de Estimulación Cardiaca de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología. REC CardioClinics. 2020;55(3):170–6. doi: 10.1016/j.rccl.2020.05.008.

Schneider H, Orru M. Telemetric Remote Monitoring Of Cardiac Devices. Is The Future Of Medicine A Liability Trap For The Physician. Interv Cardiol. 2018;10(02):25–31. doi: 10.4172/interventional-cardiology.100060.




DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.24875/10.5281/zenodo.10064399

Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.