How to cite this article: Barrera-Cruz A, Díaz-Ramos RD, López-Morales AB, Grajales-Muñiz C, Viniegra-Osorio A, Zaldívar-Cervera JA, Arriaga Dávila JJ. [Technical Guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of Zika virus infection]. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2016;54(2):211-24.

PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26960050


REVIEW ARTICLES


Received: November 19th 2014

Accepted: December 18th 2015


Technical Guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of Zika virus infection


Antonio Barrera-Cruz,a Rita Delia Díaz-Ramos,a Ana Belem López-Morales,a Concepción Grajales-Muñiz,b Arturo Viniegra-Osorio,a Jaime Antonio Zaldívar-Cervera,c José de Jesús Arriaga Dávilad


aCoordinación Técnica de Excelencia Clínica

bDivisión de Vigilancia Epidemiológica de Enfermedades Transmisibles, Coordinación de Vigilancia Epidemiológica

cCoordinación de Unidades Médicas de Alta Especialidad

dDirección de Prestaciones Médicas


Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México, México


Communication with: Antonio Barrera-Cruz

Teléfonos: (55) 5553 3589; 5726 1700, extensión 14044

Email: antonio.barrera@imss.gob.mx


Infection Zika virus is an emerging disease in the Americas region, which is caused by Zika virus (ZIKV), an arbovirus of the flavivirus genus. The ZIKV is transmitted by the bite of Aedes mosquitoes, both in urban and jungle area. After the mosquito bite, the disease symptoms usually appear after an incubation period of three to twelve days. The infection may be asymptomatic or presented with fever and not purulent conjunctivitis, headache, myalgia, arthralgia, asthenia, maculopapular rash, edema in lower limbs and, less frequently, retro-orbital pain, anorexia, vomiting, diarrhea or pain abdominal. Symptoms last for 4-7 days and are self-limiting. Neurological and autoimmune complications are rare. Since 2014 it has been detected native circulation of Zika virus in the Americas. So far, there is no specific antiviral treatment or effective vaccine, so it´s giving priority symptomatic and supportive treatment for the acute phase and make an early diagnosis of atypical and severe forms.

Keywords: Arboviruses; Arbovirus infections; Virus diseases; Communicable disease control

Zika virus infection (ZIKV) is an emerging disease caused by the virus of the same name, similar to the viruses that cause dengue, yellow fever, Japanese encephalitis, chikungunya fever, St. Louis encephalitis, or West Nile fever. ZIKV is transmitted by the bite of Aedes mosquitoes, both in an urban area (A. aegypti), and the jungle.1

The species Aedes aegypti is confined to tropical and subtropical areas, while the species Aedes albopictus is present in temperate, and even temperate-cold regions. In recent decades Ae. albopictus has left Asia and established itself in parts of Africa, Europe, and the Americas.2

Compared to Ae. aegypti, the species Ae. albopictus thrives in a wider variety of pools of water that serve as breeding grounds, such as coconut shells, cocoa pods, holes in trees, puddles on rocks, plus artificial reservoirs such as vehicle tires or dishes under flowerpots. This diversity of habitats explains the abundance of Ae. albopictus in rural and peri-urban areas as well as in shady city parks. The Ae. aegypti species is more closely associated with houses and has hatcheries indoors, for example in vases, water containers, and water tanks in bathrooms, plus the same artificial outdoor habitats as Ae. albopictus.1,2

Global epidemiological context of Zika virus

The virus was isolated for the first time on April 18th, 1947 in the forests of Zika, in Entebbe, Uganda, in a Rhesus monkey during a study about the transmission of jungle yellow fever. In early 1948, as a result of entomological and virological surveillance, ZIKV was also isolated from Aedes africans mosquitoes caught in the same forest. Serological analysis confirmed infection in humans in Uganda and Tanzania in 1952, but it was in 1968 that the virus was isolated in samples from people in Nigeria. From 1951 to 1981 cases were reported in Tanzania, Egypt, Central African Republic, Sierra Leone, and Gabon, as well as Asian countries like India, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, and Indonesia. Subsequently the virus was identified in Senegal and Ivory Coast. Remarkably, genetic analyses have shown that there are two major lineages in the virus: African and Asian.3-6

In 2007, the first major outbreak of ZIKV infection took place on the island of Yap (Micronesia) in the Pacific Ocean, with 185 suspected cases reported, of which 49 (26%) were confirmed, and 59 (32%) were considered likely. The outbreak lasted for 13 weeks (April to July). They were identified in nine of the ten communities on the island. The attack rate was 14.6 per 1000 inhabitants and a seroprevalence of 75% of the general population (prevalence overestimated, although certainly very high, due to cross-reactivity between antibodies directed against other arboviruses). 61% of cases were female patients and the median age was 36.7,8

In late October 2013, an outbreak began in French Polynesia, also in the Pacific, in which 10,000 cases were identified. Of this total, approximately 70 were serious, with neurological complications (Guillain- Barré syndrome, meningoencephalitis) or autoimmune complications (thrombocytopenic purpura, leukopenia) in a context of simultaneous circulation of dengue virus. The related vectors were Aedes aegypti and Aedes polynesiensis. ZIKV detection has been reported in mosquitoes, primates, and humans in 14 countries across three continents (Africa, Asia, Oceania).9,10  

In 2014, cases were reported in New Caledonia (belonging to New Zealand) and Cook Islands, both in the Oceania region. In the past seven years cases have been reported sporadically in travelers (Thailand, Cambodia, Indonesia, and New Caledonia).11-13

On May 7th, 2015, the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) issued an epidemiological alert to member states to establish and maintain the capacity to detect and confirm cases of Zika virus infection, to treat patients, and to implement strategies to reduce the presence of the vector.8,14

The true incidence of ZIKV infection is unknown, because the clinical manifestations are similar to infection with dengue virus, and reliable and simple diagnostic laboratory tests are lacking.


Epidemiological situation in America

Given the occurrence of outbreaks of ZIKV infection in Polynesia, starting in November 2013, the Chilean Ministerio de Salud started monitoring the behavior of the virus in the South Pacific Islands, which in February 2014 allowed public health authorities in Chile to confirm a case of indigenous transmission of ZIKV infection in Easter Island (Chile).15-18

Since February 2015, national authorities in Brazil have confirmed ZIKV circulation in 14 states: Alagoas, Bahía, Ceará, Maranhão, Mato Grosso, Pará, Paraíba, Paraná, Pernambuco, Piauí, Rio de Janeiro, Rio Grande do Norte, Roraima, and São Paulo. This is the first time that cases of ZIKV infection were reported in Continental America.19 From February 2014 to January 17th, 2016 18 countries and territories have confirmed indigenous circulation of ZIKV between 2015 and 2016: Brazil, Barbados, Colombia, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Guyana, French Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Martinique, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Puerto Rico, San Martin, Surinam, and Venezuela. Between November 2015 and January 2016, the local transmission of the virus was detected in 14 new countries and territories.16

Recent outbreaks of ZIKV fever in different regions of the world demonstrate the potential of this arbovirus to spread through territories in which there is a vector for this virus (Aedes sp.) (Figure 1).20   


Figure 1 Geographical distribution of countries with evidence of past or current Zika virus transmission (as of October 2015). Sources: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Division of Vector-Borne Diseases


Situation in Mexico and transmission risk

In Mexico, according to the Sistema Nacional de Vigilancia Epidemiológica (SINAVE / DGE / SS), through January 8, 2016 three imported cases of ZIKV have been identified (Nuevo Leon, Queretaro, and Tamaulipas) and 15 indigenous cases (10 in Chiapas, 1 in Jalisco, and 4 in Nuevo Leon). ZIKV is transmitted by Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes. The evidence of the emergence of ZIKV infection cases outside their original areas with outbreaks in various world regions demonstrates the potential of this arbovirus to spread through the territories in which there are potential vectors, as in much of the country where the presence of Aedes aegypti is documented, so it is possible to infer the potential risk of the virus to spread to other countries in the Americas, including Mexico.20,21 


Transmission dynamics

Vectors

The main vector for ZIKV is Aedes aegypti. However, it should be noted that the species Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus are widely distributed in the tropics and Ae. albopictus is also present in more temperate latitudes. Given the wide distribution of these vectors in the Americas, the entire region is susceptible to the invasion and spread of the virus.1,2 These mosquitoes tend to bite all day, although their activity may be highest at the beginning of the morning and late afternoon. Both species bite outdoors, but Ae. aegypti also can indoors. There are descriptions of sexual and perinatal transmission of the virus, and transmission through unscreened blood transfusions is also possible, which has been identified in asymptomatic blood donors during an outbreak in progress.22-24


Features of the virus

It is an arbovirus of the genus flavivirus (family Flaviviridae), phylogenetically close to viruses such as dengue, chikungunya fever, yellow fever, Japanese encephalitis, or West Nile virus.

ZIKV is transmitted by the bite of Aedes mosquitoes (Aedes aegypti), both in urban areas and the jungle. ZIKV susceptibility is general. The immunity conferred by infection seems protective long-term.25


Reservoirs

The reservoir of the disease is presumably monkeys, keeping the disease in a monkey-mosquito cycle in the wild. Monkeys and humans are probably the main reservoirs of the virus, and anthroponotic transmission (human-vector-human) occurs during outbreaks.


Incubation period

After the mosquito bite, symptoms of the disease usually appear after an incubation period of 3 to 12 days. Symptoms last from four to seven days and are self-limiting.

The infection may be asymptomatic, or present with mild or moderate clinical manifestations, and even neurological disorders.

Goals

General


Specific

Area of ​​application

This guide should be applied by all providers of health services at the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social in the first, second, and third level of care.

Definition of the disease

It is the disease caused by ZIKV, arbovirus of the genus flavivirus (family Flaviviridae), phylogenetically close to viruses such as dengue, yellow fever, Japanese encephalitis, or West Nile virus. Febrile illness, zoonotic, emergent, caused by ZIKV, acute course, usually benign and self-limiting, with potential risk of neurological complications. Its symptoms are non-specific and therefore can be confused with other febrile syndromes.

Operational case definitions

For the purposes of epidemiological surveillance, operational case definitions have been developed in order to unify the criteria for the identification, reporting, and classification of ZIKV cases. The definitions are characterized by high sensitivity; i.e. most cases can be detected through the most common signs and symptoms of the disease and screening tests.

Diagnostic specificity is given by laboratory studies, so it is essential to have the right virological, serological, and imaging results for the proper monitoring of the case until its final classification.


Suspected case of Zika virus infection

Any person with fever and rash and two or more of the following signs and symptoms: conjunctivitis (non-purulent), arthralgia, myalgia, headache, retroocular pain, vomiting, or neurological manifestations, resident or visiting areas with Zika virus transmission during the two weeks before onset of symptoms, or in contact with a confirmed case or having any epidemiological link to transmission areas.14


Confirmed case of Zika virus infection

Any suspected case with a positive result for Zika virus by laboratory tests endorsed by the InDRE.

During an epidemic it is not necessary to subject all patients to the confirmatory tests listed above. The epidemiological link may be sufficient. Importantly, indigenous transmission means mosquito populations living in a given area are infected with the virus and begin to transmit to people who are in the same area. In the presence of indigenous transmission, patients have no history of travel to endemic areas. Those who have contracted the disease in countries where ZIKV circulates are considered "imported" cases, i.e., they were bitten by infected mosquitoes during trips to places where this virus is present.14

Clinical manifestations

The infection may be asymptomatic, or present with moderate signs. Approximately 1 in 5 people infected with ZIKV becomes symptomatic. In symptomatic patients with moderate illness, symptoms are established acutely, and include fever, non-purulent conjunctivitis, headache, myalgia and arthralgia, asthenia, maculopapular rash, edema in the lower limbs, and, less frequently, retroorbital pain, anorexia, vomiting, diarrhea, or abdominal pain. Symptoms last from four to seven days and are self-limiting. Neurological and autoimmune complications are very frequent.14,15 However, so far there is evidence of probable ecological association between increased microcephaly and neurological and autoimmune syndromes with prior Zika virus infection. So the possible causal nature of the association cannot be ruled out with the available evidence.


Increased microcephaly and other congenital anomalies

In October 2015, the Centro Nacional de Enlace of Brazil reported the detection of an unusual increase in infants with microcephaly in public and private health services in the state of Pernambuco in northeastern Brazil. Up to Epidemiological Week 1 of 2016, 3530 cases of microcephaly were recorded, including 46 deaths, in 20 Brazilian states and the Federal District. Between 2010 and 2014, nationwide, an annual average of 163 cases of microcephaly were recorded.16


Evidence of vertical transmission of the Zika virus  

On January 13th, 2016, the Ministerio de Salud of Brazil reported the detection of Zika virus genome, using RT-PCR technique, in 4 cases of congenital malformation in the state of Rio Grande do Norte. The cases correspond to two miscarriages and two term newborns (37 and 42 weeks gestation, respectively) that died in the first 24 hours of life. Tissue samples from both newborns were also positive for Zika virus using immunohistochemistry. This evidence adds to the finding reported in the Epidemiological Alert of December 1st, 2015 with respect to the detection of the Zika virus genome, using RT-PCR technique, in amniotic fluid of two pregnant women in Paraíba, whose fetuses had microcephaly according to the ultrasound test that had been done.16 

Laboratory diagnostics

The diagnosis is established, first, based on the clinical signs and epidemiology of the disease, and confirmed by laboratory techniques, with techniques for detecting viral RNA (PCR) in acute patients and with IgG / IgM detection in patients with more than 5-6 days of disease progression, although cross-reactions with other flavivirus are possible.

In the first 5 days after the establishment of clinical signs (acute phase, viremic period) viral RNA can be detected from serum and using molecular techniques (real-time RT-PCR). Detection of dengue by PCR should be negative as the main differential diagnosis. A generic test against flavivirus could also be used, followed by genetic sequencing to establish the specific etiology. 

Serological tests (ELISA or neutralization) to detect specific IgM or IgG against ZIKV can be positive from day 5-6 after establishment of clinical signs. It is necessary to demonstrate increased antibody titer in paired samples with an interval of one to two weeks. The confirmation of positive results with PRNT (plaque reduction neutralization test) is recommended, showing at least a four-fold increase in the titer of neutralizing antibodies against ZIKV. Sometimes there may be cross-reactivity with other flaviviruses, especially dengue and, to a lesser extent, with yellow fever and West Nile virus. This can make one see a four-fold increase or more of the titer of neutralizing antibodies against dengue in a patient with ZIKV infection, especially if they previously had dengue infection. Because of this cross-reactivity between flaviviruses, serology results should be interpreted with care.15,18


Tests

Differential diagnosis

The differential diagnosis should take into account the epidemiological characteristics such as place of residence, history of travel, and exposure. In particular, the differential diagnosis should include: dengue and chikungunya fever (CHIK), so it is necessary to consider the following information: both diseases are borne by the same vector, have similar clinical manifestations, and can even occur at the same time in one patient.26,27

Compared with dengue, ZIKV infection causes mild clinical manifestations, the onset of fever is sharper and of shorter duration. Moreover, dengue can have a more torpid evolution, even causing death.

In chikungunya virus infection (CHIKV), the joint pain is more intense and localized in the joints and tendons, and can in some cases be incapacitating. Shock or severe bleeding is rarely observed; the onset is more acute and the duration of fever is much shorter, and maculopapular rash is more common than in dengue (Table I).


Table I Clinical and laboratory differences among dengue, chikungunya, and ZIKV10
Symptoms Dengue Chikungunya Zika
Fever ++++ +++ +++
Myalgia/arthralgia +++ ++++ ++ ↓
Edema of limbs 0 0 ++ ↑
Maculopapular rash ++ ++ +++ ↑
Retroorbital pain ++ + ++
Conjunctivitis 0 + +++ ↑
Lymphatic adenopathy ++ ++ + ↓
Hepatomegaly 0 +++ 0
Leucopenia/thrombocytopenia +++ +++ 0
Hemorrhage + 0 0
Adapted by Halstead, et al. and Yap Department of Health

Features of dengue and chikungunya

Dengue fever is a febrile disease transmitted by the bloodsucking female Aedes aegypti mosquito; the disease is self-limiting, incapacitating, and has risk of fatal complications, which may present benignly as dengue fever (DF), and seriously as dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF).

There are four serotypes of dengue (DEN1, DEN2, DEN3, DEN4), the World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that these constitute a threat for 40% of the world population living in 112 tropical and subtropical countries. It is estimated that currently there are 50 million cases worldwide, of which about 400,000 are serious cases and 25,000 die from this disease.28

Note that CHIKV can cause acute, subacute, and chronic disease. Bites of infected mosquitoes in people produce manifestations of the disease in 95% of cases. Individuals with acute CHIKV infection may present clinical manifestations or be asymptomatic, and can contribute to the spread of the disease if the vectors that transmit the virus are present and active in the same area.

After CHIKV infection, there is a silent incubation period of 2-4 days (range: 1-12 days). After this short period, the acute period of the disease takes place abruptly, coinciding with the maximum viremia. It manifests with high fever (typically above 39 °C), followed in a few hours by myalgia, arthralgia, and widespread, severe, and disabling arthritis, accompanied by headache, back pain, and maculopapular rash, predominantly on the thorax.29,30

CHIKV can affect women and men of all ages. However, it is held that the clinical presentation varies with age, with more frequent complications and severe forms in children under 1 year, adults over 65 with chronic diseases (diabetes, hypertension, etc.) and in pregnant women. The abnormal laboratory findings may include mild thrombocytopenia (> 100 000/mm3), leukopenia, and elevated liver function tests. Among the subacute and chronic manifestations of CHIKV, there is distal polyarthritis and subacute hypertrophic tenosynovitis of the wrists and ankles. These symptoms are most common two or three months after the onset of the disease.

The chronic disease is characterized by persistent symptoms for more than three months. Notably, arthritis from CHIKV infection has a symmetric and distal polyarticular pattern, affecting the hands, wrists, and ankles; it less often affects the elbows, knees, shoulders, hips, and temporomandibular joints.

With regard to diagnosis with CHIKV, three main types of tests are used: 1. Serology 2. Viral isolation and 3. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).31

Samples taken during the first week of the onset of symptoms should be tested by serological methods (ELISA for the detection of immunoglobulin M [IgM] and G [IgG]) and virological (RT-PCR and isolation)). The highest concentrations of IgM are recorded between 3 and 5 weeks after disease onset and persist about 2 months.

Samples are usually from blood or serum, but in neurological cases with features of meningoencephalitis, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) can also be obtained.

Samples collected during the first week after the onset of symptoms should be analyzed with serological and virological methods (RT-PCR). The virus can be isolated in the blood in the first days of infection. The choice of appropriate laboratory test is based on the origin of the sample (human or mosquitoes collected in field) and the time of sample collection relative to the onset of symptoms (in the case of samples of human origin).29-32

Treatment

Treating ZIKV infection is mainly symptomatic. So far, there is no specific antiviral drug treatment, so it is recommended to start symptomatic treatment after ruling out diseases such as dengue, chikungunya, measles, and bacterial infections. 

Treatment consists mainly of relieving symptoms, including joint pain, antipyretics, optimal analgesics, and fluids. Avoid aspirin for risk of Reye syndrome.15

The main management recommendations include:


 

It should be noted that the best prevention of ZIKV infection is to prevent the proliferation of the vector that transmits it, following the same recommendations for dengue and chikungunya, which are to prevent accumulation of water in tires, pots, sinks, vases, and puddles, among others.

Monitoring methods

The main purpose of monitoring is to promptly detect cases of ZIKV. Early detection and timely notification will allow for adequate outbreak response and characterization and identification of circulating viral strains.15,18

In countries with no indigenous cases of Zika virus infection it is recommended to:



In countries with indigenous cases of Zika virus infection, it is recommended to:



These efforts provide the basis for developing and maintaining effective control measures. Once the introduction of the virus is documented, continuous surveillance should be maintained to monitor epidemiological and entomological changes that may affect the transmission of ZIKV. Any change detected by monitoring should be promptly communicated to the national prevention and control authorities to ensure the timely adoption of appropriate measures.

Prevention and Control

General prevention measures

It is important to minimize the contact of the vector with patients infected with dengue, chikungunya, or ZIKV. This measure helps prevent the spread of the virus and thus of the disease. It is necessary to educate the patient, other household members, and the community about the risk of transmission and measures to reduce the vector population and contact between the vector and people.14,15

The following measures are repeated below to minimize vector contact with patients:



Prevention in the home

The use of screens in windows and doors reduces vectors entering the home, and mosquito-proof water storage containers reduce oviposition sites and local production. Within the home, the use of insecticide-treated (IT) bednets and IT curtains also reduces vector-human contact. 

The number of adult mosquitoes in the home can be reduced using commercially available pyrethroid aerosol sprays and other products designed for the home, such as mosquito coils and electric vaporizers. Aerosol spray can be applied throughout the house, but should focus on areas where adult mosquitoes rest (dark and cool areas) including bedrooms, closets, laundry baskets, etc. When making recommendations to the public, emphasis should be placed on the appropriate use of these products to reduce unnecessary exposure to pesticides 


For protection during outbreaks it is recommended to:


WHO / PAHO Recommendations

Based on the epidemiological situation in America from this condition, the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) issued the Epidemiological Alert for ZIKV infection, whose main recommendations for surveillance include:14-16



This should take into account possible cross-reactivity with dengue virus infection using serological tests.

Monitoring for the moment will be based exclusively on molecular methods (real time RT-PCR), allowing early detection and promoting the implementation of control measures that include integrated vector management, identification of circulating viral strains, and adequate characterization of outbreaks.


Patient isolation

To prevent transmission to others, the patient infected with ZIKV should avoid contact with Aedes mosquitoes, at least during the first week of illness (viremic phase). The use of nets that may or may not be impregnated with insecticide is recommended, or staying in a place protected with screens. The health personnel attending ZIKV-infected patients should be protected from bites by using mosquito repellents and wearing long sleeves and pants.  


Monitoring of neurological and autoimmune complications

Countries, particularly those in situations of possible ZIKV circulation, are encouraged to implement or intensify surveillance for neurological syndromes in all age groups. This monitoring can be established in the form of syndromic surveillance or hospital-based case monitoring. In choosing case monitoring, one must define the clinical presentations that will be subject to monitoring. It is suggested to include Guillain-Barré syndrome, Fisher syndrome, encephalitis, meningitis, and meningoencephalitis.  

The Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) in its typical form is an acute polyradiculoneuropathy that produces a bilateral and symmetrical lower sensorimotor development disorder, associated with generalized osteo-tendinous areflexia. In many cases there is a previous history of infection that causes the immune response in the nerves. Between 3.5 and 12% of patients die from complications during the acute phase. It is estimated that the annual incidence of GBS ranges between 0.4 and 4.0 cases per 100,000 population per year. In North America and in Europe GBS is most common in adults and increases steadily with age. Several studies indicate that men tend to be more affected than women. 

Fisher syndrome (or Miller Fisher) is characterized by impairment of eye movements, abnormal coordination, and loss of tendon reflexes. While the clinical triad (ataxia, ophthalmoplegia, and areflexia) is easily recognizable, in some cases it can coexist with GBS so some authors consider it a variant of GBS.


Monitoring of congenital anomalies

The purpose of monitoring should be aimed at the detection of an unusual increase in congenital abnormalities, and when an outbreak is detected, monitoring should focus on tracking the trend. For countries without an established monitoring system for congenital anomalies, the implementation of a system of detection of cases in health care facilities or hospitals is recommended. It is suggested to start by including only microcephaly, and then gradually extending to other congenital anomalies, based on the capacity and resources of the health system in the country.

As part of establishing the monitoring protocol it is essential to include a clear and operational definition of a case, as well as frequency and transmission flow data (e.g., from local to regional, then national, weekly or monthly).

Microcephaly is defined as a head circumference 2 standard deviations (SD) below the mean for age and sex, or approximately less than the third percentile. It is important to note that there are no absolute values ​​to define microcephaly, given that it varies by sex and gestational age. It is important to ensure issues related to confidentiality, referral, and reverse referral of cases where appropriate.

Event-based surveillance is a useful tool for detecting conditions or unusual events. For this reason, health professionals involved in prenatal and neonatal care should be encouraged to report all unusual events. It is recommended that infants who meet the criteria for microcephaly be evaluated by medical teams qualified to know the extent of neurological impairment and other possible abnormalities. Additional studies (laboratory and radiological) will be made according to local care protocols that include the diagnosis of other causes of microcephaly, especially those requiring treatment (e.g. congenital syphilis, cytomegalovirus, or toxoplasmosis). After clinical evaluation of the newborn, a plan of care and clinical follow-up must be developed for these newborns with microcephaly.16

Recommendations in Mexico

Given the dispersion of ZIKV in the world, including the occurrence of cases this year in Brazil and Colombia, and the risk of virus introduction to our country given high population movements and the existence of vectors in large parts of the national territory, it is necessary to maintain adequate surveillance for early detection of cases to guide prevention and control actions.

Therefore, the following is recommended:


Suspected cases of ZIKV infection are the detonators of prevention and control.


Recommendations from the Department of Epidemiology

Travelers who go to Colombia and Brazil are at risk of ZIKV infection. If you have a fever, conjunctivitis, arthralgia and / or myalgia or edema of the legs and / or feet during your stay or 12 days after of your return to Mexico:33



While staying in one of these countries it is recommended:33


Key points

Globally, viral vector-borne diseases are considered as having the most impact on public health. WHO currently lists the arboviruses as a priority health problem, and in 1998 they were considered the tenth leading cause of death from infectious diseases worldwide.

PAHO / WHO recommend its member states to establish and maintain the capacity to detect and confirm cases of Zika virus infection, treat patients, and implement an effective communication strategy with the public to reduce the presence of the mosquito that transmits this disease, especially in areas where the vector is present. 

ZIKV infection is a disease caused by Zika virus (ZIKAV), an arbovirus of the genus flavivirus (family Flaviviridae), phylogenetically close to viruses such as dengue, yellow fever, Japanese encephalitis, or West Nile virus. ZIKV is transmitted by the bite of Aedes mosquitoes, both in urban areas (A. aegypti) and the jungle. In Mexico, one imported case has been identified with a history of travel to Colombia. There is no identified local transmission. 

Conclusions

Currently, ZIKV infection is an emerging disease in the region of the Americas, because the risk of ZIKV being introduced into the region is high due to importation by travel, the presence of competent vectors (the same vectors as dengue) and the susceptibility of the population, so it is essential to implement effective actions prevention, to make timely detection of cases, and to coordinate an appropriate and rapid response, with the active participation of all stakeholders to provide effective and safe care and to minimize the risk of ZIKV importation and sustained transmission in the region.

Given the expansion of Zika virus transmission in the region of the Americas, PAHO / WHO recommend to its member states to establish and maintain the capacity to detect, report, and confirm cases of Zika virus infection, to prepare health services for a possible additional burden at all levels of care, and to implement an effective public communication strategy to reduce the presence of mosquitoes especially in areas where the vector is present.

So far, there is no specific antiviral treatment or effective vaccine, so it is priority to give symptomatic and supportive treatment for the acute phase and make timely identification of atypical and severe forms.

It should be noted that for the creation of these guidelines, documents prepared by PAHO / WHO and CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of Disease) were taken as a source of information, as well as documented experiences in attention to cases in other countries in the region, including Brazil, Colombia, and Chile.

Referencias
  1. Hayes EB: Zika virus outside Africa. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2009, 15:1347-1350.
  2. Morrison TE. Reemergence of Chikunguña Virus. J Virol 2014;88:11644-11647.
  3. Dick GW, Kitchen SF, Haddow AJ. Zika virus isolations and serological specificity. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1952;46:509–520.
  4. Dick GW. Zika virus pathogenicity and physical properties. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1952;46: 521–534.
  5. Moore DL, Causey OR, Carey DE, Reddy S, Cooke AR, Akinkugbe FM, et al. Arthropod-borne viral infection of man in Nigeria, 1964–1970. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1975;69:49–64.
  6. Fagbami AH. Zika virus infections in Nigeria: virological and seroepidemiological investigations in Oyo State. J Hyg (Lond). 1979;83:213–219.
  7. Duffy MR, Chen TH, Hancock WT et al. Zika outbreak on Yap Island, Federated States of Micronesia. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 2536–2543.
  8. Pan American Health Organization. Epidemiological alert. Zika virus May 7th, 2015. Available from: http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=3007+&Itemid=999999&lang=fr(accessed May 20, 2015).
  9. Cao-Lormeau VM, Roche C, Teissier A et al. Zika virus, French Polynesia, South Pacific, 2013. Emerg Infect Dis 2014; 20: 1084–1086.
  10. Ioos S, Mallet HP, Leparc Goffart I, Gauthier V, Cardoso T, Herida M. Current Zika virus epidemiology and recent epidemics. Med Mal Infect 2014; 44 (7): 302-307.
  11. Musso D, Nilles EJ, Cao-Lormeau VM. Rapid spread of emerging Zika virus in the Pacific area. Clin Microbiol Infect 2014;20(10):595-596.
  12. Monitoring current threats: ECDC Communicable Disease Threats Report (CDTR), week 10/2014. Available from: http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/press/news/_layouts/forms/News_DispForm.aspxList=8db7286c-fe2d-476c-9133-18ff4cb1b568&ID=966
  13. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Rapid risk assessment: Zika virus infection outbreak, French Polynesia. February 14th, 2014. Stockholm: ECDC; 2014. Available from: http://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/Zika-virus-French-Polynesia-rapid-risk-assessment.pdf
  14. Situación epidemiológica de infección por Virus Zika en América. Aviso Epidemiológico. CONAVE/03/2015/Virus Zika. [Cited 2015 Oct 21].
  15. www.paho.org/viruszika
  16. Organización Panamericana de la Salud / Organización Mundial de la Salud. Actualización Epidemiológica: Síndrome neurológico, anomalías congénitas, e infección por virus Zika. January 17 , Washington, D.C. OPS/OMS. 2016
  17. https://www.minsalud.gov.co/Paginas/Confirmados-primeros-casos-de-virus-del-zika-en-Colombia.aspx
  18. Actualización Epidemiológica. Infección por virus Zika de OMS/OPS October 16th, 2015. Available from: http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_topics&view=article&id=427&Itemid=41484&lang=es
  19. Campos GS, Bandeira AC, Sardi SI. Zika Virus Outbreak, Bahia, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015 Oct; 21 (10):1885-6. doi: 10.3201/eid2110.150847.
  20. Roth A, Mercier A, Lepers C, Hoy D, Duituturaga S, Benyon E, Guillaumot L, Souares Y. Concurrent outbreaks of dengue, chikungunya and Zika virus infections - an unprecedented epidemic wave of mosquito-borne viruses in the Pacific 2012-2014. Euro Surveill 2014;19(41). pii: 20929.
  21. Rodriguez-Morales AJ.Dupont-Rouzeyrol M, O’Connor O, Calvez E, Daurès M, John M, Grangeon JP, Gourinat AC. Zika: the new arbovirus threat for Latin America. J Infect Dev Ctries 2015;9(6): 684-685.
  22. Musso D, Roche C, Robin E, Nhan T, Teissier A, Cao-Lormeau VM. Potential sexual transmission of Zika virus. Emerg Infect Dis 2015;21(2):359-361.
  23. Musso D, Nhan T, Robin E, Roche C, Bierlaire D, Zisou K, Shan Yan A, Cao-Lormeau VM, Broult J. Potential for Zika virus transmission through blood transfusion demonstrated during an outbreak in French Polynesia, November 2013 to February 2014. Euro Surveill 2014 Apr 10;19(14). pii: 20761
  24. Besnard M, Lastere S, Teissier A, Cao-Lormeau V, Musso D. Evidence of perinatal transmission of Zika virus, French Polynesia, December 2013 and February 2014. Euro Surveill. 2014 Apr 3;19(13). pii: 20751.
  25. Faye O, Freire CC, Iamarino A, Faye O, de Oliveira JV, Diallo M, Zanotto PM, Sall AA. Molecular evolution of Zika virus during its emergence in the 20(th) century. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2014;8(1):e2636.
  26. Musso D, Cao-Lormeau VM, Gubler DJ. Zika virus: following the path of dengue and chikungunya?. Lancet 2015 Jul 18;386(9990):243-244.
  27. Dupont-Rouzeyrol M, O’Connor O, Calvez E, Daurès M, John M, Grangeon JP, Gourinat AC. Co-infection with Zika and dengue viruses in 2 patients, New Caledonia, 2014. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(2): 381-382.
  28. Lineamientos para la vigilancia epidemiológica de dengue por laboratorio versión no. 01. INDRE, 2015.
  29. Barrera-Cruz A, Díaz-Ramos RD, Viniegra-Osorio A, Grajales-Muñiz C, Dávila-Torres J. Technical guidelines for the prevention and treatment of chikungunya fever. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2015;53 (1):102-119.
  30. OPS/OMS/CDC. Preparación y respuesta ante la eventual introducción del virus chikungunya en las Américas.
  31. CDC. Información para médicos clínicos. Available from: http:/www.cdc.gov/chikungunya/pdfs/CHIKV_Clinicians.pdf
  32. Vigilancia de virus Zika (ZIKV) en las Américas: Recomendaciones provisionales para la detección y diagnóstico por laboratorio. 29 de junio 2015 (Acceso 03 11 2015. Available from: http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_topics&view=article&id=427&Itemid=41484&lang=es
  33. Aviso preventivo de viaje a Brasil y Colombia ante los casos de infección por virus Zika. Unidad de Inteligencia Epidemiológica y Sanitaria (UIES). Octuber 20th, 2015.

Annex 1 Algorithm for detecting Zika virus (ZIKV)32

Notes:

1. According to the epidemiological profile of the country and accounting for the clinical characteristics of the infection, one should consider the inclusion of other Arboviruses as part of the differential algorithm for Zika virus.

2. This algorithm is not exhaustive, and dengue infection must be ruled out according to clinical management guidelines and the specific laboratory algorithm.

3. These recommendations are provisional and subject to further modifications according to advancing knowledge about the disease and the etiologic agent.


Conflict of interest statement: The authors have completed and submitted the form translated into Spanish for the declaration of potential conflicts of interest of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, and none were reported in relation to this article.