Resumen
Introducción: la manga gástrica es la cirugía bariátrica más realizada, sin embargo, un porcentaje de los pacientes sometidos a este procedimiento no logran una pérdida de peso satisfactoria o sufren reganancia. El SADI-S se ha propuesto como una cirugía de revisión aceptable con buenos resultados y baja tasa de complicaciones. Nuestro objetivo es presentar el primer caso de SADI-S realizado en el Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social como cirugía de revisión por reganancia de peso posterior a manga gástrica.
Caso clínico: hombre de 50 años con obesidad grado 3, hipertensión, dislipidemia y apnea obstructiva del sueño, sometido a manga gástrica en 2019 con reganancia del 49.5 % de la pérdida del exceso de peso en 2 años por lo que se decide realizar SADI con peso prequirúrgico de 138 kg e IMC: 40.3 kg/m2. Se realiza cirugía sin complicaciones, egresando al segundo día postquirúrgico. A seis meses de seguimiento con pérdida de peso satisfactoria, remisión de comorbilidades, adecuado estado clínico y paraclínicos sin datos de desnutrición ni anemia.
Conclusiones: el SADIS-S se perfila como la mejor opción para cirugía de revisión de manga gástrica por pérdida de peso ineficiente, por lo que fue el de elección en nuestro paciente con resultados satisfactorios. Consideramos al SADI-S como opción segura y eficaz para pacientes resistentes a la pérdida de peso.
Abstract
Background: Sleeve gastrectomy is the most frequently performed bariatric surgery, however several patients did not achieve satisfactory weight loss or suffer of weight regain. The SADI-S has been proposed as an acceptable revision surgery with good results and low complications rate. Our objective is to present the first case of SADI-S performed in the Mexican Institute of Social Security as surgical revision after sleeve gastrectomy for weight regain.
Clinic case: A 50-year-old man presented with a history of type 3 obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and obstructive sleep apnea, summited to sleeve gastrectomy on 2019 with weight regain of 49.5 % of excess weight lost in 2 years so we decided to perform a SADI, with preoperative weight 138 kg and BMI 40.3 kg/m2. The surgery occurred without complications, and he was discharged on postoperative day 2. At six months of follow-up continue with satisfactory weight loss, comorbidities remission, asymptomatic and laboratory tests without data of malnutrition or anemia.
Conclusions: The SADI-S seems to be the best option for revisional surgery after sleeve gastrectomy for unsatisfied weight loss or weight regain, so it was the procedure of choice in our case with satisfactory outcomes. We consider the SADI-S as a secure and efficient option for patients with resistance to weight loss.
Romero-Martínez M, Shamah-Levy T, Vielma-Orozco E, et al. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2018-19: metodología y perspectivas. Salud Publica Mex. 2019;61(6):917-923.
Zaveri H, Surve A, Cottam D, et al. A multi-institutional study on the mid-term outcomes of single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass as a surgical revision option after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2019;29:3165-3173. doi: 10.1007/ s11695-019-03917-1.
American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Estimate of bariatric surgery numbers, 2011-2021. [Actualizado junio 2022; citado 27 Jul 2023]. Disponible en: https://asmbs. org/resources/estimate-of-bariatric-surgery-numbers.
Deitel M, Crosby RD, Gagner M. The first international consensus summit for sleeve gastrectomy (SG), New York City, October 25–27, 2007. Obes Surg. 2008;18(5):487-96. doi: 10.1007/ s11695-008-9471-5.
Deitel M, Gagner M, Erickson AL, et al. Third international summit: current status of sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7:749-59. PMID: 21945699.
Zhu J, Du L, Lu L, et al. Laparoscopic Re-sleeve Gastrectomy with Single Anastomosis Duodenoileal Switch (RS-SADIS) for Weight Regain or Unsatisfied Weight Loss After Initial Sleeve Gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2021;31(10):4647-4648. doi: 10.1007/ s11695-021-05517-4.
Spinos D, Skarentzos K, Esagian SM, et al. The effectiveness of single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy/one anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S/OADS): an updated systematic review. Obes Surg. 2021;31:1790-1800. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05188-7.
Osorio J, Lazzara C, Admella V, et al. Revisional laparoscopic SADI-S vs. duodenal switch following failed primary sleeve gastrectomy: a single-center comparison of 101 consecutive cases. Obes Surg. 2021;31(8):3667-3674. doi: 10.1007/ s11695-021-05469-9.
Shoar S, Poliakin L, Rubenstein R, et al. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal switch (SADIS): a systematic review of efficacy and safety. Obes Surg. 2018;28:104-113. doi: 10.1007/ s11695-017-2838-8.
Ceha CMM, van Wezenbeek MR, Versteegden DPA, et al. Matched short-term results of SADI versus GBP after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2018;28:3809-3814. doi: 10.1007/ s11695-018-3415-5.
Surve A, Zaveri H, Cottam D, et al. A retrospective comparison of Roux-en-Y duodenal switch with single anastomosis duodenal switch (SIPS-stomach intestinal pylorus sparing surgery) at a single institution with two-year follow-up. Surg Obes RelatDis. 2016;12(7):S63. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.11.020.
Cottam A, Cottam D, Portenier D, et al. A matched cohort analysis of stomach intestinal pylorus saving (SIPS) surgery versus biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch with two-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2017;27:454-461. doi: 10.1007/ s11695-016-2341-7.
Brown WA, de Leon-Ballesteros GP, Ooi G, et al. Single Anastomosis Duodenal-Ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy/ One Anastomosis Duodenal Switch (SADI-S/OADS) IFSO Position Statement—Update 2020. Obes Surg. 2021;31:3-25. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05134-7.
Barajas-Gamboa JS, Moon S, Romero-Velez G, et al. Primary single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) versus sleeve gastrectomy to SADI conversions: a comparison study of prevalence and safety. Surg Endosc. 2023;37(11):8682-8689. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10305-5.
Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MÁ, Pérez N, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass as a revisional or second-step operation after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg ObesRelat Dis. 2020; 16(10):1491-1496. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.05.022.
Dijkhorst PJ, Boerboom AB, Janssen IMC, et al. Failed Sleeve Gastrectomy: Single Anastomosis Duodenoileal Bypass or Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass? A Multicenter Cohort Study. Obes Surg. 2018;28(12):3834-3842. doi: 10.1007/ s11695-018-3429-z.
Bashah M, Aleter A, Baazaoui J, et al. Single Anastomosis Duodeno-ileostomy (SADI-S) Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB) as Revisional Procedures for Patients with Weight Recidivism After Sleeve Gastrectomy: aComparative Analysis of Efficacy and Outcomes. Obes Surg. 2020;30 (12):4715-4723. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04933-2.
Clapp B, Mosleh KA, Corbett J, et al. One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Single Anastomosis Duodenoileostomy with Sleeve: Comparative Analysis of 30-Day Outcomes Using the MBSAQIP. Obes Surg. 2023;33(3):720-724. doi: 10.1007/ s11695-023-06452-2.
Surve A, Cottam D, Richards C, et al. A Matched Cohort Comparison of Long-term Outcomes of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) Versus Single-Anastomosis Duodeno-ileostomy with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADI-S). Obes Surg. 2021;31(4):1438- 1448. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05131-w.
Balamurugan G, Leo SJ, Sivagnanam ST, et al. Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Between Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) vs One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) vs Single Anastomosis Duodeno-ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADI-S): a Systematic Review of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery. Obes Surg. 2023;33(7):2194-2209. doi: 10.1007/ s11695-023-06602-6.