II. Process Studies (Diagnostic Test)
Main Article Content
Keywords
Research, Research projects and development, Diagnostic techniques and procedures
Abstract
The purpose of a diagnostic test is to establish the presence of health or disease, it can even graduate the degree of illness. Diagnostic tests are usually assessed mathematically. Thus, sensitivity and specificity are estimated once the existence or not of disease is known; in clinical practice, the course of action is often reverse: from positivity or negativity of a test for the presence or not of the disease and, therefore, positive and negative predictive values are used. Mathematical strategies allow for an observation to be quantified, but clinical judgement is required in order to establish the quality of that observation; in consequence, some characteristics have to be considered: a) selection under the same criteria for cases and witnesses; b) inclusion of the entire spectrum of severity of the disease (trying that all the strata include an important number of subjects); c) the interpretation of the gold standard and the test under study must be blinded and done by experts; d) the interpretation of the results must show the applicability of the test in everyday practice; e) reproducibility of the test must be proven. It is important not to forget that, usually, only a patient is seen at a time; therefore, full knowledge of the diagnostic test performance is essential, as well as considering the clinical aspects for its correct application.
References
Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests 1: sensitivity and specificity. BMJ. 1994;308:1552.
Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values. BMJ. 1994;309:102.
Fagan TJ. Nomogram for Bayes’s theorem. N Engl J Med. 1975;293:257.
Feinstein AR. Clinical epidemiology. The architecture of clinical research. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company; 1985.
Grund B, Sabin C. Analysis of biomarker data: logs, odds ratios, and receiver operating characteristic curves. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2010;5(6):473-9.
Jaeschke R, Guyatt G, Lijmer J. Diagnostic tests. En: Guyatt G, Rennie D, editors. Users’ guides to the medical literature. Chicago: AMA Press; 2002: p. 121-140.
Sackett DL, Straus S, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine. How to practice and teach EBM. Second edition. Edinburgh: Churchill Living-stone; 2000. p. 67-93.
Sackett DL, Haynes RB. The architecture of diagnostic research. BMJ. 2002:324;7336-56.
Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P. Clinical epidemiology. A basic science for clinical medicine. Third edition. US: Little Brown; 2009.
Soreide K, Korner H, Soreide JA. Diagnostic accuracy and receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis in surgical research and decision making. Ann Surg. 2011; 253(1):27-34.
Tripepi G, Jager KJ, Dekker FW, Zoccali C. Diagnostic methods 2: receiver. operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Kidney Int. 2009;76(3):252-6.