Ankle-brachial index assessed in a Mexican population with vascular risk. The INDAGA study

Main Article Content

Carlos Cantú-Brito
Erwin Chiquete
Manuel Duarte-Vega
Alberto Rubio-Guerra
Martín Herrera-Cornejo
Jacobo Nettel-García

Keywords

Peripheral artery disease, Ankle brachial index, Cardiovascular disease, Cerebrovascular disorders

Abstract

Objective: to know the peripheral arterial disease (PAD) prevalence and its determinants in a nationwide survey in Mexican population.

Methods: baseline ankle brachial index (ABI) measured by Doppler was performed in patients at high vascular risk for PAD. ABI between 1 and 1.3 was regarded as normal. ABI ≤ 0.9 (a low ABI) was considered to be an indicator of PAD. ABI > 1.3 (a high ABI) was also considered abnormal, as an indirect index of artery calcification and stiffness.

Results: a total of 5 101 patients were evaluated: 1 212 patients (23.8 %) had ABI ≤ 0.9, and 431 (8.4 %) > 1.3 (including 1 % with incompressible vessels). ABI ≤ 0.9 was associated with age, arterial hypertension, diabetes, current smoking, dyslipidemia and previous vascular events. On the other hand, ABI > 1.3 was associated with male gender, diabetes, previous smoking habit and history of vascular events. A high proportion of patients (62.5 %) with established PAD, identified by a low ABI (≤ 0.9) were asymptomatic or with minimum symptoms at the time of their assessment. 

Conclusion: a significant prevalence of abnormal ABI was identified. ABI measurement by Doppler can help to identify patients who need intense secondary prevention and more aggressive treatment of vascular risk factors.

Abstract 166 | PDF (Spanish) Downloads 53

References

López AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Kamison DT, Murray CJ. Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet 2006;367(9524):1747-1757.

 

Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, et al; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2008;117(4):e25-e146.

 

Meaney E, Lara-Esqueda A, Ceballos-Reyes GM, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors in the urban Mexican population: the FRIMEX study. Public Health 2007;121:378-384.

 

Agnelli G, Cimminiello C, Meneghetti G, Urbinati S; Polyvascular Atherothrombosis Observational Survey (PATHOS) Investigators. Low ankle-brachial index predicts an adverse 1-year outcome after acute coronary and cerebrovascular events. J Thromb Haemost 2006;4(12): 2599-2606. 

 

Belch JJ, Topol EJ, Agnelli G, et al. Prevention of atherothrombotic disease network. Critical issues in peripheral arterial disease detection and management: a call to action. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:884-892.

 

Coccheri S; CAPRIE Investigators. Distribution of symptomatic atherothrombosis and influence of the atherosclerotic disease burden on risk of secondary ischemic events: results from CAPRIE. Eur Heart J 1998;19: 1268.

 

Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Ohman EM, et al; REACH Registry Investigators. International prevalence, recognition, and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors in outpatients with atherothrombosis. JAMA 2006;295(2):180-189.

 

Guo X, Li J, Pang W, Zhao M, Luo Y, Sun Y, Hu D. Sensitivity and specificity of ankle-brachial index for detecting angiographic stenosis of peripheral arteries. Circ J 2008; 72(4):605-610.

 

Holland-Letz T, Endres HG, Biedermann S, et al. Reproducibility and reliability of the ankle-brachial index as assessed by vascular experts, family physicians and nurses. Vasc Med. 2007;12(2):105-12.

 

Olin JW, Allie DE, Belkin M, Bonow RO, et al. 2010 performance measures for adults with peripheral artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on performance measures, the American College of Radiology, the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions, the Society for Interventional Radiology, the Society for Vascular Medicine, the Society for Vascular Nursing, and the Society for Vascular Surgery (Writing Committee to Develop Clinical Performance Measures for Peripheral Artery Disease). Circulation 2010;122(24): 2583-2618.

 

Greenland P, Abrams J, Aurigemma GP, et al. Prevention Conference V. Beyond secondary prevention: Identifying the high-risk patient for primary prevention. Noninvasive tests of atherosclerotic burden. Circulation 2000;101(1):E16-E22.

 

Rutherford RB, Baker JD, Ernst C, Johnston KW, Porter JM, Ahn S, et al. Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised version. J Vasc Surg 1997;26(3):517-538.

 

Hirsch AT, Criqui MH, Treat-Jacobson D, et al. Peripheral arterial disease detection, awareness, and treatment in primary care. JAMA 2001;286(11):1317-1324.

 

Bozkurt AK, Tasci I, Tabak O, Gumus M, Kaplan Y. Peripheral artery disease assessed by ankle-brachial index in patients with established cardiovascular disease or at least one risk factor for atherothrombosis. CAREFUL Study: a national, multi-center, cross-sectional observational study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2011;11:4.

 

Ferreira AC, Macedo FY. A review of simple, non-invasive means of assessing peripheral arterial disease and implications for medical management. Ann Med 2010; 42(2): 139-50.

 

Newman AB, Siscovick DS, Manolio TA; the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) Collaborative Research Group. Ankle-Arm Index as a Marker of Atherosclerosis in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Circulation 1993;88(3): 837-845.

 

Diehm C, Lange S, Darius H, et al. Association of low ankle brachial index with high mortality in primary care. Eur Heart J 2006;27(14):1743-1749.

 

Álvarez J, Gil A, Quintana M. Prevalencia de enfermedad arterial periférica asintomática en pacientes con ICTUS isquémico no cardioembólico. Neurologia 2009; 24(6):366-372.

 

Resnick HE, Lindsay RS, McDermott MM, et al. Relationship of high and low ankle brachial index to all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality: the Strong Heart Study. Circulation 2004;109(6):733-739.