Clinical research XII. From the clinical judgment to the transversal design
Main Article Content
Keywords
Cross-sectional studies, Cohort studies, Case-control studies, Clinical trial
Abstract
A longitudinal study—like cohort or clinical trial- has the virtue of following the logical sequence in which occurs the components of causality phenomenon. However, in a cross-sectional survey, this logical sequence does not exist, because the three components are measured at one time -basal state, maneuver, and result—. However, the architectural design “clinical judgment” helps us to rebuild these components artificially in the time sequence in which they occurred. The way the population is assembled and how information is obtained transversal and retrolective carries the risk of bias. While trying to associate a probable maneuver to an outcome in a pathological situation is difficult and often causes bias, a cross-sectional survey is the best to show the development of healthy people simulating a longitudinal study, like the height and weight estimation according to age. This type of design has been called “a longitudinal cross sectional study”.
References
Feinstein AR. Clinical biostatics. Saint Louis: The CU Mosby Co. 1977.
Feinstein AR. Clinical epidemiology. The architecture of clinical research. Philadelphia: WB Sanders; 1985.
Feinstein AR. Directionality and scientific inference. J Clin Epidemiol 1989;42:829-833.
Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern epidemiology. Third edition. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Third edition. New Jersey: Pearson-Prentice Hall; 2009.
Talavera JO, Wacher-Rodarte NH, Rivas-Ruiz R. Clinical research III. The causality studies. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2011;49(3):289-294.
Talavera JO. Clinical research I. The importance of research design. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2011;49(1): 53-58.