Expert consensus validation of an instrument to improve the timely detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip in children

##plugins.themes.themeEleven.article.main##

George Benjamin Edgar https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7786-9802
Jesús Vértiz-Ramírez https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7525-8597
Juan Molina-Rodríguez https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2214-7877
Humberto León-Soto https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3113-6135
Luis Loyo-Soriano https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4047-2226
Mario Salvador Sánchez Domínguez https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1595-6916

Palabras clave

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip, Mass Screening, Early Diagnosis, Diagnosis

Resumen

Background: Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) is the most common human congenital malformation. When diagnosed and treated before five months of age, it has a high cure rate. If not, surgical management is required with high economic costs, a great impact on morbidity and sequelae that can generate permanent disability.


Objective: To design and validate an instrument to timely detect DDH.


Material and methods: A systematic review of the current literature on the timely diagnosis of DDH was carried out using PRISMA methodology. An expert panel, with eight specialists from different public and private health institutions was formed to validate it.


Results: All participants in the expert panel agreed that DDH is a public health problem. They consider that there are many patients with late diagnosis and sequelae due to a lack of timely treatment. There was consensus on the feasibility of implementing the proposal. The expressed need to update the current regulations regarding diagnostic means was identified.


Conclusions: It is necessary to promote epidemiology, risk factors, correct physical examination, ideal imaging methods according to the patient's age, and timely referral pathways for patients. Add our DDH instrument to the section to the healthy child card. This should include risk factors: pelvic presentation, female sex, and family history of DDH. As well as the marking of a normal vs abnormal physical examination.

Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

Referencias

1. Bakarman K, Alsiddiky AM, Zamzam M, et al. Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH): etiology, diagnosis, and management. Cureus. 2023;15(8).

2. Witt C. Detecting developmental dysplasia of the hip. Adv Neonatal Care. 2003;3(2):65–75.

3. Henak CR, Abraham CL, Anderson AE, et al. Patient-specific analysis of cartilage and labrum mechanics in human hips with acetabular dysplasia. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2014;22(2):210–7.

4. Jacobsen KK, Laborie LB, Kristiansen H, et al. Genetics of hip dysplasia–a systematic literature review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024;25(1):762.

5. Bialik V, Bialik GM, Blazer S, et al. Developmental dysplasia of the hip: a new approach to incidence. Pediatrics. 1999;103(1):93–9.

6. Sioutis S, Kolovos S, Papakonstantinou M-E, et al. Developmental dysplasia of the hip: a review. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2022;32(3).

7. Noordin S, Umer M, Hafeez K, et al. Developmental dysplasia of the hip. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2010 Sep;2(2):e19.

8. Sayed J, Abdulwahab IJ, Aldaadi BB, et al. Incidence and Associated Risk Factors of Neonatal Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Pediatr Heal Med Ther. 2025;139–47.

9. Mahan ST, Katz JN, Kim Y-J. To screen or not to screen? A decision analysis of the utility of screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jul;91(7):1705–19.

10. Kuitunen I, Uimonen MM, Haapanen M, et al. Incidence of neonatal developmental dysplasia of the hip and late detection rates based on screening strategy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw open. 2022;5(8):e2227638–e2227638.

11. Vaquero-Picado A, González-Morán G, Garay EG, Moraleda L. Developmental dysplasia of the hip: update of management. EFORT open Rev. 2019;4(9):548–56.

12. Patel H. Preventive health care, 2001 update: Screening and management of developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns. CMAJ. 2001;164(12):1669–77.

13. Thaler M, Biedermann R, Lair J, et al. Cost-effectiveness of universal ultrasound screening compared with clinical examination alone in the diagnosis and treatment of neonatal hip dysplasia in Austria. J Bone Jt Surg Br Vol. 2011;93(8):1126–30.

14. Jiménez C, Delgado-Rodríguez M, López-Moratalla M, et al. Validity and diagnostic bias in the clinical screening for congenital dysplasia of the hip. Acta Orthop Belg. 1994;60:315.

15. Ömeroǧlu H, Koparal S. The role of clinical examination and risk factors in the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip: A prospective study in 188 referred young infants. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2001;121(1):7–11.

16. Chavoshi M, Soltani G, Zargar SS, et al. Diagnostic performance of clinical examination versus ultrasonography in the detection of developmental dysplasia of hip: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2022;10(5):403.

17. Graf R. Classification of hip joint dysplasia by means of sonography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1984;102(4):248–55.

18. Ulziibat M, Munkhuu B, Schmid R, et al. Implementation of a nationwide universal ultrasound screening programme for developmental dysplasia of the neonatal hip in Mongolia. J Child Orthop. 2020 Aug;14(4):273–80.

19. Baronciani D, Atti G, Andiloro F, et al. Screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip: from theory to practice. Pediatrics. 1997;99(2):e5–e5.

20. Morales WGB. Análisis de prisma como metodología para revisión sistemática: Una aproximación general. Saúde em Redes. 2022;8(sup1):339–60.

21. Shang Z. Use of Delphi in health sciences research: a narrative review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102(7):e32829.

22. Graham B, Regehr G, Wright JG. Delphi as a method to establish consensus for diagnostic criteria. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56(12):1150–6.

23. Godley DR. Assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. JAAPA. 2013;26(3):54–8.

24. Colta RC, Stoicanescu C, Nicolae M, et al. Hip dysplasia screening - epidemiological data from Valcea County. J Med Life. 2016;9(1):106–11.

25. Husum H, Ghaffari A, Rytoft LA, et al. Positive predictive values in clinical screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Acta Paediatr. 2021;110(8):2430–4.

26. Roof AC, Jinguji TM, White KK. Musculoskeletal screening: developmental dysplasia of the hip. Pediatr Ann. 2013;42(11):e238–44.

27. Raimann R, Aguirre D. Displasia del desarrollo de la cadera: tamizaje y manejo en el lactante. Rev Médica Clínica Las Condes. 2021;32(3):263–70.

28. Barrera CA, Cohen SA, Sankar WN, et al. Imaging of developmental dysplasia of the hip: ultrasound, radiography and magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Radiol. 2019;49(12):1652–68.

29. Cadima M, Peláez C. Detección de Displasia de Cadera en lactantes menores a 6 meses en el servicio de consulta externa de pediatría del Hospital Tiquipaya, incidencia y factores de riesgo. Gac Médica Boliv. 2013;36(2):68–70.

30. Frias-Austria R, García-Pinto G. La ley de detección de la DDC en niños, un logro del CMO. Acta ortopédica Mex. 2016;30(6):277–8.

31. Tirta M, Rahbek O, Kold S, et al. RISK FACTORS FOR DEVELOPMENTAL DYSPLASIA OF THE HIP AT THREE MONTHS OF AGE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. In: Orthopaedic Proceedings. Bone & Joint; 2024. p. 117.

32. Gibbard M, Zivkovic I, Jivraj B, et al. A Global Survey of Patient and Caregiver Experiences Throughout Care for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip. J Pediatr Orthop. 2021 Jul;41(6):e392–7.

33. Merchant RM, Khan SA, Douglas C, et al. A Virtual Clinic for DDH Pavlik Harness Monitoring. J Pediatr Orthop [Internet]. 2022;42(2). Available from: https://journals.lww.com/pedorthopaedics/fulltext/2022/02000/a_virtual_clinic_for_ddh_pavlik_harness_monitoring.14.aspx

34. Gupta S, Patel K, Craig CL, Nemetz T, Skoczylas M, Burrows H, et al. Simulation-Based Training Improves Developmental Hip Dysplasia Examination and Diagnosis Skills on Newborns. Acad Pediatr. 2025;25(4):102782.

35. Smart L, Cundy W, Williams N, Arnold A, Childs J, Pelentsov L, et al. Screening accuracy for developmental dysplasia of the hip by child health nurses. Children. 2024;11(8):915.