Transformación de la epidemiología en la era de la inteligencia artificial

##plugins.themes.themeEleven.article.main##

Juan Rodrigo Gómez-Bernal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4070-7727

Palabras clave

Epidemiología, Inteligencia Artificial, Medicina de Precisión, Toma de Decisiones, Sistemas de Salud

Resumen

La epidemiología ha sido fundamental para el análisis de los problemas de salud y para la toma de decisiones en los sistemas sanitarios y la salud pública. No obstante, los métodos tradicionales de la epidemiología, diseñados fundamentalmente para identificar asociaciones causales a nivel poblacional mediante medidas de datos agrupados, presentan limitaciones inherentes para capturar la heterogeneidad individual en la respuesta ante exposiciones específicas. Esta aproximación poblacional dificulta la predicción personalizada del desenlace en un individuo particular, cuyos factores de riesgo pueden manifestarse de forma distinta al promedio grupal, particularmente cuando intervienen múltiples variables contextuales y perfiles biológicos únicos.


Los avances en inteligencia artificial han generado herramientas capaces de integrar grandes volúmenes de información, identificar patrones complejos en subgrupos específicos y elaborar estimaciones más personalizadas, transicionando desde un enfoque reactivo basado en promedios poblacionales hacia modelos predictivos centrados en trayectorias individuales. Sin embargo, estos desarrollos no sustituyen los fundamentos metodológicos de la epidemiología, ya que la identificación de exposiciones, desenlaces y relaciones causales continúa dependiendo del marco conceptual epidemiológico.


Bajo esta perspectiva, las tensiones actuales no representan una crisis disciplinaria, sino una transición hacia enfoques más amplios que combinan análisis poblacionales con herramientas predictivas avanzadas. Esta integración resulta especialmente relevante para instituciones de gran escala, como las de seguridad social, que requieren modelos capaces de aprovechar datos diversos para mejorar la comprensión de los procesos de salud y apoyar decisiones clínicas y operativas.

Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

Referencias

1. Ahlbom A. Epidemiology is about disease in populations. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020;35:1111. doi:10.1007/s10654-020-00701-9

2. Salathé M, Bengtsson L, Bodnar TJ, et al. Digital Epidemiology. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8:e1002616. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002616

3. Ng HKT, Lovric M. Statistical Methods in Epidemiology. International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science. 2025;2514–2523. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-69359-9_616

4. Buckee C. Improving epidemic surveillance and response: big data is dead, long live big data. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2:e218–e220. doi:10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30059-5

5. Ye Y, Pandey A, Bawden C, et al. Integrating artificial intelligence with mechanistic epidemiological modeling: a scoping review of opportunities and challenges. Nat Commun. 2025;16:581. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-55461-x

6. Wiemken TL, Kelley RR. Machine Learning in Epidemiology and Health Outcomes Research. Annu Rev Public Health. 2020;41:21–36. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094437

7. Zhou J, Li L, Su J. Leveraging big data in health care and public health for AI driven talent development in rural areas. Front Public Health. 2025;13:1524805. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1524805

8. Kim K-N, Hong Y-C. The exposome and the future of epidemiology: a vision and prospect. Environ Health Toxicol. 2017;32:e2017009. doi:10.5620/eht.e2017009

9. Panteli D, Adib K, Buttigieg S, et al. Artificial intelligence in public health: promises, challenges, and an agenda for policy makers and public health institutions. Lancet Public Health. 2025;10:e428–e432. doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(25)00036-2

10. Chen S, Yu J, Chamouni S, et al. Integrating machine learning and artificial intelligence in life-course epidemiology: pathways to innovative public health solutions. BMC Med. 2024;22:354. doi:10.1186/s12916-024-03566-x

11. Hasanah U, Avian C, Darmawan JT, et al. CheXNet and feature pyramid network: a fusion deep learning architecture for multilabel chest X-Ray clinical diagnoses classification. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023;40:709–722. doi:10.1007/s10554-023-03039-x

12. Si Y, Du J, Li Z, et al. Deep representation learning of patient data from Electronic Health Records (EHR): A systematic review. J Biomed Inform. 2021;115:103671. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103671

13. Dara M, Dianatpour M, Azarpira N, et al. The transformative role of Artificial Intelligence in genomics: Opportunities and challenges. Gene Rep. 2025;41:102314. doi:10.1016/j.genrep.2025.102314

14. Gupta RM, Lall M. COVID-19 pandemic and artificial intelligence possibilities: A healthcare perspective. Med J Armed Forces India. 2021;77:S242–S244. doi:10.1016/j.mjafi.2021.06.001

15. Dong E, Du H, Gardner L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(5):533-534. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30120-1

16. Malla S, Kumar LK, Alphonse PJA. Novel fuzzy deep learning approach for automated detection of useful COVID-19 tweets. Artif Intell Med. 2023 Sep;143:102627. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102627.

17. Milinovich GJ, Williams GM, Clements AC, Hu W. Internet-based surveillance systems for monitoring emerging infectious diseases. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14(2):160-168. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70244-5

18. Arsevska E, Valentin S, Rabatel J, et al. Web monitoring of emerging animal infectious diseases integrated in the French Animal Health Epidemic Intelligence system. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0199960. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0199960

19. Choi SB, Ahn I. Forecasting seasonal influenza-like illness in South Korea after 2 and 30 weeks using Google Trends and influenza data from Argentina. PLoS One. 2020;15(7):e0233855. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233855

20. Colón-González FJ, Lake IR, Morbey RA, et al. A methodological framework for the evaluation of syndromic surveillance systems: a case study of England. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):544. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5422-9

21. Fleuren LM, Klausch TLT, Zwager CL, et al. Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:383–400. doi:10.1007/s00134-019-05872-y

22. Cui Q, Zhang F, Fu S, et al. High Spatiotemporal Resolution PM2.5 Concentration Estimation with Machine Learning Algorithm: A Case Study for Wildfire in California. Remote Sens. 2022;14:1635. doi:10.3390/rs14071635

23. Wong PY, Su HJ, Lung SC, et al. Explainable geospatial-artificial intelligence models for the estimation of PM2.5 concentration variation during commuting rush hours in Taiwan. Environ Pollut. 2024;349:123974. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123974

24. Kassem H, Beevi AA, Basheer S, et al. Investigation and Assessment of AI’s Role in Nutrition—An Updated Narrative Review of the Evidence. Nutrients. 2025;17:190. doi:10.3390/nu17010190

25. Choochaiwattana W, Jaruariyanon P, Jitpranee A, et al. AI powered dietary proportion assessment for improving accuracy and practicality of the balanced meal plate model. Sci Rep. 2025;15:29631. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-29631-w

26. Kaliappan S, Maranan R, Niveditha VR, et al. Enhancing the Efficiency of Computational Genetic Epidemiology using HPC-Driven AI Models. In: 3rd IEEE International Conference on ICT in Business Industry and Government (ICTBIG). IEEE; 2023. p. 1-6. doi:10.1109/ICTBIG59752.2023.10455975

27. Ding X, Shang B, Xie C, et al. Artificial intelligence in the COVID-19 pandemic: balancing benefits and ethical challenges in China’s response. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2025;12:245. doi:10.1057/s41599-025-04564-x

28. El-Helaly M. Artificial Intelligence and Occupational Health and Safety, Benefits and Drawbacks. Med Lav. 2024;115:e2024014. doi:10.23749/mdl.v115i2.15835

29. Agostinelli T, Generosi A, Ceccacci S, et al. Validation of computer vision-based ergonomic risk assessment tools for real manufacturing environments. Sci Rep. 2024;14:27785. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-79373-4

30. Yang Z, Song D, Ning J, et al. A Systematic Review: Advancing Ergonomic Posture Risk Assessment through the Integration of Computer Vision and Machine Learning Techniques. IEEE Access. 2024;12:1-1. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3509447

31. Rana R, Higgins N, Stedman T, et al. Passive AI Detection of Stress and Burnout Among Frontline Workers. Nurs Rep. 2025;15:373. doi:10.3390/nursrep15110373

32. Cavique L. Implications of causality in artificial intelligence. Front Artif Intell. 2024;7:1439702. doi:10.3389/frai.2024.1439702

33. Ghassemi M, Oakden-Rayner L, Beam AL. The false hope of current approaches to explainable artificial intelligence in health care. Lancet Digit Health. 2021;3:e745–e750. doi:10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00208-9

34. Finlayson SG, Subbaswamy A, Singh K, et al. The Clinician and Dataset Shift in Artificial Intelligence. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:283–286. doi:10.1056/NEJMc2104626

35. Martinez O, Martinez C, Parra CA, et al. Machine learning for surgical time prediction. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021;208:106220. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106220

36. Bartek MA, Saxena RC, Solomon S, et al. Improving Operating Room Efficiency: A machine learning approach to predict case-time duration. J Am Coll Surg. 2019;229:346. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.05.029

37. Weiner EB, Dankwa-Mullan I, Nelson WA, et al. Ethical challenges and evolving strategies in the integration of artificial intelligence into clinical practice. PLOS Digit Health. 2025;4:e0000810. doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000810

38. Celi LA, Cellini J, Charpignon ML, et al. Sources of bias in artificial intelligence that perpetuate healthcare disparities—A global review. PLOS Digit Health. 2022;1:e0000022. doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000022

39. Kimmerle J, Timm J, Festl-Wietek T, et al. Medical Students’ Attitudes Toward AI in Medicine and their Expectations for Medical Education. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2023;10:23821205231219344. doi:10.1177/23821205231219346

40. Ejaz H, McGrath H, Wong BLH, et al. Artificial intelligence and medical education: A global mixed-methods study of medical students’ perspectives. Digit Health. 2022;8:20552076221089100. doi:10.1177/20552076221089099

41. Moor M, Banerjee O, Abad ZSH, et al. Foundation models for generalist medical artificial intelligence. Nature. 2023;616:259–265. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05881-4