Using polypropylene mesh in surgery for stress urinary incontinence

Authors

  • Erick Arturo Murguía-Flores <p>Servicio de Urolog&iacute;a Ginecol&oacute;gica,&nbsp;Centro M&eacute;dico Nacional de Occidente, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Guadalajara, Jalisco</p>
  • Fernando Quintero-Granados <p>Servicio de Urolog&iacute;a Ginecol&oacute;gica,&nbsp;Centro M&eacute;dico Nacional de Occidente, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Guadalajara, Jalisco</p>
  • Luis Guillermo Torres-Gómez <p>Servicio de Ginecolog&iacute;a y Obstetricia,&nbsp;Centro M&eacute;dico Nacional de Occidente, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Guadalajara, Jalisco</p>
  • Mariela Denisse Chávez-Navarro <p>Servicio de Ginecolog&iacute;a y Obstetricia,&nbsp;Centro M&eacute;dico Nacional de Occidente, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Guadalajara, Jalisco</p>
  • Martha Berenice Vázquez-Gómez <p>Servicio de Ginecolog&iacute;a y Obstetricia,&nbsp;Centro M&eacute;dico Nacional de Occidente, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Guadalajara, Jalisco</p>
  • Elizabeth Rodríguez-Rodríguez <p>Servicio de Enfermer&iacute;a,&nbsp;Centro M&eacute;dico Nacional de Occidente, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Guadalajara, Jalisco</p>

Keywords:

Stress urinary incontinence, Surgical mesh, Polypropylenes

Abstract

Background: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is defined as the involuntary leakage of urine while making an effort, such as coughing, sneezing or during activity. Since SUI generates high costs and affects the quality of life, it is important to make a proper diagnosis and, consequently, manage SUI efficiently. The objective was to know whether it is appropriate to use polypropylene mesh for SUI.

Methods: A historical cohort was conducted by reviewing records of patients with SUI treated with polypropylene mesh during 2013 with a follow-up of 12 months.

Results: Urinary continence was achieved in 98% of patients at one year. The complication rate was 2%. Only 12% of patients had normal weight. The most commonly used surgery was the placement of tension-free transobturator tape.

Conclusion: The healing average reported worldwide is 90%, while the average for complications is 10%. In this study we achieved similar results. Using polypropylene mesh for surgical correction of SUI is a safe and effective alternative; however, studies with larger populations and more extensive monitoring to clarify this situation are required.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al International Urogynecological Association; International Continence Society. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4-20. doi: 10.1002/nau.20798.

 

Milson I, Altman D, Lapitan. Epidemiology of urinary and faecal incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (eds.). Incontinence. Fourth edition. Plymouth, United Kingdom: Health Publications Ltd.; 2009. p. 35.

 

Grodstein F, Fretts R, Lifford K, Resnick N, Curhan G. Association of age, race, and obstetric history with urinary symptoms among women in the Nurses' Health Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Aug;189(2):428-34.

 

Staskin D, Hilton P, Emmanuel A. Initial assessment of incontinence. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (eds.). Incontinence: 3rd International Consultation on Incontinence. Plymouth, United Kingdom: Health Publications Ltd.; 2005. p. 485.

 

FitzGerald MP, Brubaker L. Urinary incontinence symptom scores and urodynamic diagnoses. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21:30-5.

 

Brown JS, Bradley CS, Subak LL, Richter HE, Kraus SR, Brubaker L, et al. The sensitivity and specificity of a simple test to distinguish between urge and stress urinary incontinence. Ann Intern Med. 2006 May 16;144(10):715-23.

 

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Committee on Practice Bulletins--Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 85: Pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep;110(3):717-29.

 

Nager CW. The urethra is a reliable witness: simplifying the diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:1649-51.

 

Walters MD, Jackson GM. Urethral mobility and its relationship to stress incontinence in women. J Reprod Med. 1990;35:777-84.

 

Weber AM, Taylor RJ, Wei JT, Lemack G, Piedmonte MR, Walters MD. The cost-effectiveness of preoperative testing (basic office assessment vs. urodynamics) for stress urinary incontinence in women. BJU International. 2002;89:356-63.

 

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Committee on Practice Bulletins--Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 603: Urinary incontinence in women. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123: 1403-7.

 

Labrie J, Berghmans BL, Fischer K. Surgery versus physiotherapy for stress urinary incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1124-33.

 

Anger JT, Weinberg AE, Albo ME, Smith AL, Kim JH, Rodriguez LV. Trends in surgical management of stress urinary incontinence among female Medicare beneficiaries. Urology. 2009;74(2):283-7.

 

Kilonzo M, Vale L, Stearns SC, Grant A, Cody J, Glazener CM, et al. Cost effectiveness of tension-free vaginal tape for the surgical management of female stress incontinence. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Fall;20(4):455-63.

 

Sung VW, Rogers RG, Schaffer JI, Balk EM, Uhlig K, Lau J, et al. Graft use in transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Nov;112(5):1131-42. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181898ba9.

 

Diwadkar GB, Barber MD, Feiner B, Maher C, Jelovsek JE. Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Feb;113(2 Pt 1):367-73. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318195888d.

 

Luck AM, Steele AC, Leong FC, McLennan MT. Short-term efficacy and complications of posterior intravaginal slingplasty. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Jun;19(6):795-9.

 

Bruschini H, Nuñez R, Truzzi JC, Simonetti R, Cury J, Ortiz V, et al. Low cost polypropylene sling procedure for correction of stress urinary incontinence: A possible solution for developing countries? The International Continence Society (ICS). 2005. Disponible en https://www.ics.org/Abstracts/Publish/43/000360.pdf

 

Romano SV, Marconi G, Ponce C, Garcia PE, Heime S, et al. Resultados del sling en el tratamiento de la incontinencia femenina en un hospital publico. Rev. Arg. de Urol. 2006;71(3):167-72. Disponible enhttp://revistasau.org/index.php/revista/article/viewFile/3257/3201

 

Veloso-M D, Saens-N P, Ainardi-R MJ, Olivares-P A, Cabezas-G S, Orozco-S C. Cinta suburetral transobturatriz Libre de tensión para el tratamiento de la incontinencia de orina de esfuerzo: 3 años de seguimiento. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 2010;75(4): 240-6. Disponible enhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-75262010000400005

 

Adefna-Pérez RI, Adefna-Berrojo R, Ramos-Díaz N, Izquierdo-Lara FT, Castellanos-González JA. Luque-Laborit C. Resultados del cabestrillo suburetral transobturatriz con cinta de polipropileno para el tratamiento quirúrgico de la incontinencia de orina de esfuerzo. Rev Cubana Cir. 2011;50(3):312-23. Disponible en http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-74932011000300008

 

ElSheemy MS, Elsergany R, ElShenoufy A. Low-cost transobturator vaginal tape inside-out procedure for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence using ordinary polypropylene mesh. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Apr;26(4):577-84. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2552-1.

Issue

Section

Original Articles