Pre-analytical quality assessment in the microbiology laboratory

Authors

  • Meztli Monserrat Carbajal-Vázquez <p>Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro M&eacute;dico Nacional Siglo XXI, Hospital de Cardiolog&iacute;a, Laboratorio.&nbsp;Ciudad de M&eacute;xico,&nbsp;M&eacute;xico.</p> http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9884-3762
  • María Guadalupe Carrillo-Montes <p>Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro M&eacute;dico Nacional Siglo XXI, Unidad de Educaci&oacute;n e Investigaci&oacute;n, Coordinaci&oacute;n&nbsp;de Investigaci&oacute;n en Salud, Divisi&oacute;n de Desarrollo de la Investigaci&oacute;n en Salud. Ciudad de M&eacute;xico, M&eacute;xico.</p> http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8812-3555
  • Roxana Blanca Rivera-Leaños <p>Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro M&eacute;dico Nacional Siglo XXI, Hospital de Cardiolog&iacute;a, Laboratorio. Ciudad de&nbsp;M&eacute;xico, M&eacute;xico.</p> http://orcid.org/0009-0009-1366-3675
  • Verónica Alicia Farias-Basurto <p>Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro M&eacute;dico Nacional Siglo XXI, Hospital de Cardiolog&iacute;a, Laboratorio. Ciudad de&nbsp;M&eacute;xico, M&eacute;xico.</p> http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4669-7271
  • César Bárcena-Molina <p>Instituto de Seguridad Social para los Trabajadores del Estado, Hospital Fernando Quiroz Guti&eacute;rrez, Servicio de Cardiolog&iacute;a.&nbsp;Ciudad de M&eacute;xico, M&eacute;xico.</p> http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7000-0315

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10790465

Keywords:

Microbiology, Research, Quality Control, Pre-Analytical Phase

Abstract

Background: Errors in the pre-analytical phase of the microbiology laboratory reduce patient safety and generate additional expenses. In Mexico we do not have systems for evaluation and monitoring of the pre-analytical phase; quality indicators are proposed for continuous improvement.

Objective: Identify the main reasons for rejection of respiratory samples in the microbiology laboratory and evaluate the usefulness of preanalytical quality indicators.

Material and methods: Cross-sectional study. Review of microbiology laboratory applications from August 2022 to July 2023, calculated the frequency of rejection and identification of the main reasons for it, it was analyzed using quality indicators based on the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC).

Results: Of 3530 processing requests, 582 were for respiratory samples (16.48%), 44 samples rejected due to pre-analytical errors (7.56%), the main causes identified: Transcription error 22.7%, identification error 20.4%, Samples that do not comply Murray-Washington criteria 25.0%, Errors in obtaining/collecting samples 20.4%, Samples with defects in conservation 4.5%, Unidentified samples: 6.8%.

Conclusions: The main causes of rejection were identified; upon analysis with the preanalytical quality indicators, they were found at desirable levels and in reference ranges; only 4 were useful for long-term implementation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Meztli Monserrat Carbajal-Vázquez, <p>Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro M&eacute;dico Nacional Siglo XXI, Hospital de Cardiolog&iacute;a, Laboratorio.&nbsp;Ciudad de M&eacute;xico,&nbsp;M&eacute;xico.</p>

    Médico Cirujano

    Residente de Patología Clínica 

  • Roxana Blanca Rivera-Leaños, <p>Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro M&eacute;dico Nacional Siglo XXI, Hospital de Cardiolog&iacute;a, Laboratorio. Ciudad de&nbsp;M&eacute;xico, M&eacute;xico.</p>

    Jefa de laboratorio de UMAE H CARDIOLOGIA CMN SIGLO XXI

    Patologia clínica

References

Apunte-Osorio A, Francisco-Pérez J. Quality in the preanalytic management of a clinical laboratory of derivation of biological samples. Agora Heterodoxias. 2017;3(2):68-88.

Marzana-Sanz I, Ibarz-Escuer M, Llopis-Diaz MA, et al. Recomendaciones para el diseño e implementación de un programa de aseguramiento de la calidad de la fase preanalítica. Rev Lab Clin. 2019;12(4):e54-65. doi: 10.1016/j.labcli.2019.01.0031888.

Sciacovelli L, Lippi G, Sumarac Z, et al. Pre-analytical quality indicators in laboratory medicine: Performance of laboratories participating in the IFCC working group “Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety” project. 2019;497:35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.07.007.

Das-Chugh T, Kummar-Duggal A, Dewan-Duggal S. Patient Safety, Clinical Microbiology, and Collaborative Healthcare. Ann Natl Acad Med Sci. 2022;58(03):128-35. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1744390.

Secretaria de Salud. Programa de Acción Específico Prevención y Control de las Enfermedades Respiratorias e Influenza 2013-2018 [Internet]. México: Secretaría de Salud; 2023. Disponible en: https://www.gob.mx/salud/documentos/programa-de-accion-especifico-prevencion-y-control-de-las-enfermedades-respiratorias-e-influenza-2013-2018.

Akalın BetülSB. Analysis on the Errors in the Pre-analytical Process in a Clinical Microbiology Laboratory. IJBCS. 2019;8(1):37-45. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341991333.

Mehndiratta M, Pasha EH, Chandra N, et al. Quality Indicators for Evaluating Errors in the Preanalytical Phase. J Lab Physicians. 2021;13(02):169-74. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1729473.

Plebani M, Sciacovelli L, Aita A. Quality Indicators for the Total Testing Process. Clin Lab Med. 2017;37(1):187-205. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2016.09.015.

Ćelap I, Vukasović I, Juričić G, et al. Minimum requirements for the estimation of measurement uncertainty: Recommendations of the joint working group for uncertainty of measurement of the CSMBLM and CCMB. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2017 Oct 15;27(3):030502. doi: 10.11613/BM.2017.030502.

Khumalo S, Makgatho S. Analysis of reasons for rejection of biological specimens at  national health laboratory service - Dr George Mukhari Tertiary  Laboratory. Popul Med. 2023;5:A656. doi: 10.18332/popmed/164852.

Korhan-Sığ A, Özen N, Çetin Duran A, et al. Quality Data and Errors in a Tertiary Microbiology Laboratory (2017-2020): “The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.” Hamidiye Med J. 2023;4(2):128-35.  doi: 10.4274/hamidiyemedj.galenos.2023.88700.

Jnah A, Yagoubi M, Seffar M, et al. Maîtrise des non-conformités de la phase pré-analytique au Laboratoire de Bactériologie du CHU Ibn Sina à Rabat (Maroc) Control of non-conformities in the pre-analytical phase at the Bacteriology Laboratory of the Ibn Sina University Hospital in Rabat (Morocco). Tunis Med. 2022;100(3):247-54.

Cadamuro J, Lippi G, Von-Meyer A, et al. European survey on preanalytical sample handling - Part 1: How do european laboratories monitor the preanalytical phase? on behalf of the european federation of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine (EFLM) working group for the preanalytical phase (WG-PRE). Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2019;29(2):322-33. doi: 10.11613/BM.2019.020704.

Budayanti NS, Suryawan K, Iswari IS, et al. The Quality of Sputum Specimens as a Predictor of Isolated Bacteria From Patients With Lower Respiratory Tract Infections at a Tertiary Referral Hospital, Denpasar, Bali-Indonesia. Front Med (Lausanne). 2019;6:64. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00064.

Mosha VV, Kabanyana C. The rate of sample rejection and pre-analytical errors at KCMC Clinical Laboratory in Moshi, Kilimanjaro. EAHRC. 2021;3(1):118-24. Disponible en: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/easci/article/view/235404.

Sciacovelli L, Panteghini M, Lippi G, et al. Defining a roadmap for harmonizing quality indicators in Laboratory Medicine: a consensus statement on behalf of the IFCC Working Group “Laboratory Error and Patient Safety” and EFLM Task and Finish Group “Performance specifications for the extra-analytical phases”. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55(10):1478-88. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0412.

Asitava-Deb Roy, Das D. An evaluation of the errors occurring in pathology and microbiology laboratories of a tertiary care teaching hospital and their root cause analyses. J Healt Res Rev Dev Ctries. 2019;6(3):102-6. doi: 10.4103/jhrr.jhrr_38_19.

Quiroz-Arias C. Errores preanalíticos en el laboratorio clínico  de un hospital de tercer nivel: prueba piloto. Salud Barranquilla. 2010;26(2):189-200.

Kang F, Li W, Xia X, et al. Three years’ experience of quality monitoring program on pre-analytical errors in china. J Clin Lab Anal. 2021;35(3):e23699. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23699.

Caballero A, Gómez-Rioja R, Ventura M, et al. Evaluación de 18 indicadores de calidad del Programa de Garantía Externa de la Calidad de Preanalítica de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Laboratorio (SEQCML). Adv Lab Med. 2022;3(2):188-200. doi: 10.1515/almed-2022-0036.

Keski̇n A, Aci R, Arslanbek-Erdem M, et al. Evaluation of Rejection Rates and Reasons among Specimens Taken from Different Hospital Units. Med Lab J. 2021;15(6):38-43. doi: 10.29252/mlj.15.6.38.

Moreno-López AB, López-Picazo Ferrer JJ, Blázquez-Álvarez JM, et al. Diseño de un conjunto de indicadores sobre recomendaciones de «No Hacer». J Healthc Qual Res. 2020;35(4):217-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2019.11.005.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-20