Comment on article: “Risk factors associated with cognitive impairment in older adults: cross-sectional study”

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10711179

Keywords:

Risk Factors, Bias, Cross-Sectional Studies, Aged, Cognitive Dysfunction

Abstract

In patients with mild cognitive impairment, the activities of basic and instrumented daily living are preserved, this distinguishes it from major cognitive impairment. In the baseline state of the cross-sectional study on risk factors associated with cognitive impairment, patients with dependence in basic daily living activities were observed, so it is possible to incur an incorrect attribution of this factor, since functional dependence is usually a consequence of cognitive impairment and not one of the factors that precede it, so an-error is made when using the diagnostic criteria for mild cognitive impairment. Cross-sectional studies identify risk factors by reconstructing phenomenology, which can lead to attributing as a cause a factor that, in reality, is a consequence of the outcome.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Carlos Gustavo Boyzo-Jimenez, <p>Centro M&eacute;dico ABC Santa Fe, Departamento de Geriatr&iacute;a. Ciudad de M&eacute;xico, M&eacute;xico.</p>

    Residente de 4to año de geriatría.

    Jefe de residentes de geriatría, Centro Médico ABC

    Doctorante en ciencias médicas 

  • Ipsae Edith Melgoza-Toral, <p>Centro M&eacute;dico ABC Santa Fe, Departamento de Medicina Preventiva. Ciudad de M&eacute;xico, M&eacute;xico.</p>

    Geriatra.

    Médico escrito al departamento de medicina preventiva. Centro médico ABC.

References

Moreno-Noguez M, Castillo-Cruz J, García-Cortés LR, et al. Factores de riesgo asociados a deterioro cognitivo en adultos mayores: estudio transversal. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2023;61(3):395-406. doi: 10.5281/zenedo.8319815

Jaul E, Barron J. Age-Related Diseases and Clinical and Public Health Implications for the 85 Years Old and Over Population. Front Public Health. 2017;5:316964. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00335.

Feinstein AR. Clinical judgment. The Williams & Wilkins Company. 1967;1-414. Disponible en: https://books.google.com/books/about/Clinical_Judgment.html?id=M8whAQAAMAAJ

Lee J. Mild Cognitive Impairment in Relation to Alzheimer’s Disease: An Investigation of Principles, Classifications, Ethics, and Problems. Neuroethics. 2023;16(2):1-18. doi: 10.1007/s12152-023-09522-5.

Chen YX , Liang N , Li XL, et al. Diagnosis and Treatment for Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Consensus Statements. Front Neurol. 2021;12:719849. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.719849.

Reisberg B, Ferris SH, De Leon MJ, et al. The Global Deterioration Scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2006;139(9):1136-9. Disponible en: https://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/ajp.139.9.1136.

Talavera JO, Rivas-Ruiz R. Investigación clínica XII. Del juicio clínico a la encuesta transversal. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2012;50(6):641-4.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-27

Issue

Section

Letter to the Editor