When the one who heals dies. The physician at the end of life
Main Article Content
Keywords
Hospice Care, Palliative Care, Attitude to Death, Health Personnel, Right to Die
Abstract
Abstract
A physician’s death represents a critical point of tension between the values of modern medicine and the ethical limits of care. This review article analyzes how physicians face their own end of life and the type of care they receive compared with the general population. A narrative review of literature published between 2014 and 2025 was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and SciELO databases with the MeSH and DeCS descriptors: “Terminal care”, “Palliative care”, “Attitude to death”, “Health personnel”, “Right to die”. Findings show that although physicians express a preference for a dignified death with therapeutic proportionality and symptom control, many still die under highly technological and interventionist schemes. Mexico lacks systematic data documenting how its physicians die, revealing a gap between ethical intention and institutional practice. This analysis proposes developing a observational study to characterize therapeutic intensity, respect for autonomy, and the moral distress experienced by healthcare teams as bioethical and occupational issues within the health system.
References
1. Gawande A. Being Mortal: Medicine and What Matters in the End. New York: Metropolitan Books; 2014.
2. Redwine HM, Ganti L. Cicely Saunders: Pioneering palliative care and the evolution of hospice services. Cureus. 2024;16(12):e75176. doi:10.7759/cureus.75176.
3. Bosslet GT, Pope TM, Rubenfeld GD, et al. Responding to requests for potentially inappropriate treatments in intensive care units. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191(11):1318-1330. doi:10.1164/rccm.201505-0924ST.
4. Matlock DD, Yamashita TE, Min SJ, et al. How U.S. doctors die: A cohort study of health care utilization at end of life. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(5):1061-1067. doi:10.1111/jgs.14112.
5. Wunsch H, Scales DC, Gershengorn HB, et al. End-of-life care received by physicians compared with nonphysicians. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(7):e197650. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.7650.
6. Kiang MV, Irizarry RA, Scheuer LS, et al. Excess mortality among physicians and other healthcare workers in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic, March 2020–December 2021. JAMA Intern Med. 2023;183(4):382-391. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.6466.
7. Zimmermann C, Kralj B, Kapusta ND, et al. Suicide mortality among physicians, dentists, veterinarians, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals: A nationwide study, 1986–2020. Psychiatry Res. 2023;323:115170. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115170.
8. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). Estadísticas de Defunciones Registradas 2022. Aguascalientes (México): INEGI; 2023. Disponible en: https://www.inegi.org.mx
9. Academia Nacional de Medicina de México. Especialidades médicas y esperanza de vida: un análisis de los obituarios de los médicos 1997-2019. 22 mayo 2025. Disponible en: https://academianacionaldemedicina.org/publicaciones/div/especialidades-medicas-y-esperanza-de-vida-un-analisis-de-los-obituarios-de-los-medicos-1997-2019/
10. Giannetta N, Villa G, Pennestrì F, et al. Moral distress scores of nurses working in intensive care units for adults using Corley’s scale: A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(17):10640. doi:10.3390/ijerph191710640.
11. Organización Panamericana de la Salud / Organización Mundial de la Salud (OPS/OMS). Perfil de País: México. Salud en las Américas+ 2024 – Mortalidad prematura potencialmente evitable. Washington (DC): OPS; 2024. Disponible en: https://www.paho.org
12. Michels G, Schallenburger M, Neukirchen M, et al. Recommendations on palliative care aspects in intensive care medicine. Crit Care. 2023;27:355. doi:10.1186/s13054-023-04622-3.
13. Siddaway AP, Wood AM, Hedges LV. How to do a systematic review: A best-practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annu Rev Psychol. 2019;70:747-770. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803.
14. Gómez-Vírseda C, De Maeseneer Y, Gastmans C. Relational autonomy in end-of-life care ethics: A contextualised approach to real-life complexities. BMC Med Ethics. 2020;21(1):50. doi:10.1186/s12910-020-00495-1.
15. Carrasco-Zafra MI, López-Mínguez JJ, Priego-García M, et al. Palliative sedation at the end of life: prevalence and characteristics in a specialised palliative care setting. BMC Palliat Care. 2024;23:176. doi:10.1186/s12904-024-01606-0.
16. Aghabarary M, Yaghoobzadeh A. Medical futility and its challenges: A review study. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2016;9:10. Disponible en: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5203684/
17. Pan H, Shi W, Zhou Q, et al. Palliative care in the intensive care unit: not just end-of-life care. Intensive Care Res. 2023;3:77-82. doi:10.1007/s44231-022-00009-0.
18. Secretaría de Salud de la Ciudad de México. Formato de Voluntad Anticipada para el paciente adulto [Internet]. Ciudad de México: Secretaría de Salud de la Ciudad de México, Programa de Voluntad Anticipada y Cuidados Paliativos; 2025 [citado 18 agosto 2025]. Disponible en: https://www.salud.cdmx.gob.mx/storage/app/media/uploaded-files/Formato%20Voluntad%20Anticipada%20Adulto%202025.pdf
19. Mathews M, Idrees S, Ryan D, et al. System-based interventions to address physician burnout: a qualitative study of Canadian family physicians’ experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13(1):1-9. doi:10.34172/ijhpm.8166.
20. Wolff JL, Khosla N, Leo MC, et al. Advance care planning, end-of-life preferences, and burdensome care: a pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2025;185(2):162-170. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.6215.
21. Zwakman M, van der Heide A, van Zuylen L, et al. Advance care planning: A systematic review about determinants and outcomes. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(12):3945-3957. doi:10.1007/s00520-018-4294-5.
22. Alanazi MA, Shaban MM, Ramadan OM, et al. Navigating end-of-life decision-making in nursing: A systematic review of ethical challenges and palliative care practices. BMC Nurs. 2024;23:467. doi:10.1186/s12912-024-02087-5.
23. Hodkinson A, Zhou A, Johnson J, et al. Associations of physician burnout with career engagement and quality of patient care: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2022;378:e070442. doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-070442.
24. World Medical Association (WMA). WMA Statement on Physicians’ Well-Being. Ferney-Voltaire: WMA; 2015 (revisado 2025). Disponible en: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-statement-on-physicians-well-being/
25. Rinderle T, Willett J. Bioethical distinctions of end-of-life care practices #422. J Palliat Med. 2021;24(9):1400-1402. doi:10.1089/jpm.2021.0320.
26. Foster K, Roberts C. The Heroic and the Villainous: a qualitative study characterising the role models that shaped senior doctors’ professional identity. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16(1):73. doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0731-0.World Health Organization (WHO).
27. Global Strategic Directions for Nursing and Midwifery 2021–2025: Strengthening the Health Workforce and Promoting Well-Being. Geneva: WHO; 2021. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/publications
Article Sidebar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain their copyright and grant the Revista Médica del IMSS the right of first publication. Articles are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows sharing as long as the author and the original source are properly credited.