Analysis of life quality on patients with thoracolumbar fractures

Main Article Content

Marco Polo Malacón-Gutierrez http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7564-7031
Hugo Vega-Alvarez http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1618-5778
Iván Cruz-Aceves http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5197-2059
Rafael Angel Bonilla-Salcedo http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1234-2556

Keywords

Cohort Study, Thoracolumbar, Bone Fractures, Quality of Life

Abstract

Background: Patients with thoracolumbar fractures with TLICS 4 classification are at the limit of surgical fixation with regards to conservative treatment; however, results in our environment are not known, which is why this study has innovative characteristics.


Objective: To determine the quality of life in patients with TLICS 4 thoracolumbar fractures using traditional fixation with regards to no fixation in a third level hospital.


Material and methods:  A cohort prospective study was carried out in patients with TLICS 4 classification thoracolumbar fractures using traditional fixation with regards to no fixation in beneficiaries from the Mexican Institute for Social Security. The SF-12 instrument, which assessed quality of life, was administered; age, sex, days of hospitalization, time of spinal cord injury were searched in the patients’ medical history. It was used descriptive and inferential statistics using Student's t or Mann-Whitney U.


Results: 20 patients participated and 9 had traditional fixation (45%). All patients had type E spinal cord injuries according to the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. Mean age of non-fixation was 42.2 ± 12.9 and of fixation 44.9 ± 10.2; in non-fixation 6 (67%) were male. The quality of life score was 29.1 ± 0.9 in the conservative treatment and 28.7 ± 1.3 in the surgical treatment, p < 0.462.


Conclusions: No differences in quality of life were observed in patients with TLICS 4 thoracolumbar fractures using traditional fixation with regards to no fixation.

Abstract 54 | PDF (Spanish) Downloads 22

References

De la Torre González D, Góngora López J. Fracturas vertebrales toraco lumbares. TRAUMA, 2003;6:44-48. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/trauma/tm-2003/tm032b.pdf.

Llado A. Rothman-Simeone. Columna vertebral. Rev Ortop Traumatol 2004;48:157-8. doi: 10.1016/s1888-4415(04)76188-3.

Briem D, Behechtnejad A, Ouchmaev A, et al. Pain regulation and health-related quality of life after thoracolumbar fractures of the spine. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(11):1925-33. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0395-x.

Kanna RM, Raja DC, Shetty AP, Rajasekaran S. Thoracolumbar Fracture Dislocations Without Spinal Cord Injury: Classification and Principles of Management. Global Spine J. 2021 Jan;11(1):63-70. doi: 10.1177/2192568219890568.

Viswanathan V, Kanna R. Management of thoracolumbar fractures in adults: Current algorithm. International Journal of Spine. 2019;4:1-10. Disponible en:  https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Management-Of-Thoracolumbar-Fractures-In-Adults%3A-Viswanathan-Kanna/8e9ea6ea59f59356fb0c71faaa6d5229c0648bf6.

Kepler CK, Vaccaro AR, Koerner JD, et al. Reliability analysis of the AO spine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system by a worldwide group of naive spinal surgeon. Eur Spine J. 2015; 25:1082-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1554203.

Nath HD, Barua KK, Rahman A, et al. Management of Thoracolumbar Fracture with Posterior Decompression with Fusion and Fixation by Pedicle Screw and Rod—Our Experience. Indian J Neurotrauma 2019;16:38-44. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1700376.

Singh K, Kim D, Vaccaro A. Lesiones vertebrales toráxicas y lumbares. Capítulo 69. En: Rothman-Simeone vol 2. 5a ed. Elsevier; 2007. 

Chapman JR, Agel J, Jurkovich GJ, Bellabarba C. Lesiones toracolumbares de la flexión-distracción: morbosidad asociada y resultados neurológicos. Espina Dorsal. 2008;33:648-57. Disponible en: https://www.scielo.br/j/coluna/a/DQFzvRn7VxsyCjRHTv7Tmsf/?lang=es&format=pdf.

Kotb M, Kotb A, Anwar H, Kattab MF. Thoracolumbar Fractures, Posterior versus Anterior Management: A Case Series and Literature Review. EgySpineJ. 2019;30:12-22. doi: 10.21608/esj.2019.7091.1087.

Gomleksiz C, Egemen E, Senturk S, et al. Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Review of Classifications and Surgical Methods. J Spine. 2015; 4: 1-6. Disponible en: https://www.hilarispublisher.com/open-access/thoracolumbar-fractures-a-review-of-classifications-and-surgical-methods-2165-7939-1000250.pdf.

Smith HE, Anderson DG, Vaccaro AR, et al. Anatomy, Biomechanics, and Classification of Thoracolumbar Injuries. Seminars in Spine Surgery. 2010;22:2-7. doi: 10.1053/j.semss.2009.10.001.

Wood K, Buttermann G, Mehbod A, et al. Operative compared with nonoperative treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture without neurological deficit. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A:773-81. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.08.082.

Roberts T, Garret L, Cepela D. Classifications In Brief: American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2017;75:1499-504. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5133-4.

Bazán PL, Borri AE, Tores PU, et al. Clasificación de las fracturas toracolumbares: comparación entre las clasificaciones de AO y Vaccaro. Coluna/Columna. 2010;9(2):165-70.

Park C, Kim S, LeeT, et al. Clinical relevance and validity Of TLICS system for thoracolumbar spine injury. Nature Scientific Reports.  2020.

doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76473-9.

Rhinn J, Anderson D, Harris E, et al. A review of the TLICS system: a novel, user-friendly thoracolumbar trauma classification system. Acta Orthopaedica. 2008;79(4):461-6. doi: 10.1080/17453670710015436.

Esclarín-de Ruz A. Lesión medular traumática. Valoración y manejo integral. Medicine - Programa de Formación Médica Continuada Acreditado. 2019;12:4387-400. doi: 10.1016/j.med.2019.03.020. 

Mittal S, Ifthekar S, Ahuja K, et al. Outcomes of Thoracolumbar Fracture-Dislocation Managed by Short-Segment and Long-Segment Posterior Fixation: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Int J Spine Surg. 2021;15(1):55-61. doi: 10.14444/8006.

Dai LY. Remodeling of the spinal canal after thoracolumbar burst fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;382:119-23. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200101000-00018.

Pérez Estudillo CA, Sánchez Alonso D, López Meraz MA et al. Aplicaciones terapéuticas para la lesión de médula espinal. Revista eNeurobiología. 2018;9:1-16. doi: 10.25009/eb.v9i21.2534.

American Spinal Injury Association. Normas Internacionales para la Clasificación Neurológica de las Lesiones de la Médula Espinal (ISNCSCI). Edición revisada 2019. ASIA; 2019; 0-0. Disponible en: https://asia-spinalinjury.org/product/international-standards-for-neurological-classification-of-spinal-cord-injury-isncsci-revised-2019-spanish-language-edition/

Rutges JP, Oner FC, Leenen LP. Timing of thoracic and lumbar fracture fixation in spinal injuries: a systematic review of neurological and clinical outcome. Eur Spine J, 2007;16:579-87. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0224-7.

Öner F, Wood KB, Smith JS, et al. Therapeutic decision making in thoracolumbar spine trauma. Spine. 2010;35 Suppl: S235-44. doi: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181f32734.

Gnanenthiran SR, Adie S, Harris IA. Nonoperative versus operative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic deficit: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:567-77. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2157-7.