Understanding the crisis of the medical profession: a sociological perspective
Main Article Content
Keywords
Sociology, Medical, Medicalization, Professional Autonomy, Medical Education, Profession
Abstract
In the last decades, medicine has experienced intense technological, political and cultural changes that have reconfigured the role of the physician. To characterize the actual status of the medical profession, this article discusses the crisis in the medical profession through the identification and analysis of 6 macrosocial phenomena that can be traced through the sociological perspective including commercialism, managerialism and medicalization. Aside of these tendencies, it seems that it is in the daily encounter of the physician and the new role of the patient where these changes are reproduced and strengthened. The analysis nourishes from a sociological perspective by eliciting the classical attributes of the profession: monopoly of knowledge, auto-regulation, mandate and license. In the light of this concept, it becomes clear that the first three attributes suffer an involution, which offers insight to reexamine the grounds in which the concept was constructed, and to reflect on the implications for medical education.
References
2. Cockerham W. Medical sociology. 11th ed. EUA:Pearson;2010. 247-63.
3. Zuger A. Dissatisfaction with medical practice. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(1):69-75.
4. Coe R. Sociología de la medicina. España:Alianza Editorial;1973. 218-51.
5. Frenk J, Gómez-Dantés O. ¿Atención a la salud o a la enfermedad?Reestableciendo el equilibrio. Salud Publica Mex. 2016;58(1):84b-8b.
6. Ballard K, Elston MA. Medicalisation:a multi-dimensional concept. Soc Theor Health. 2005;3:228-41.
7. Conrad P. The shifting engines of medicalisation. J Health Soc. 2005;46(1):3-14.
8. Timmermans S, Oh H. The continued social transformation of the medical profession. J Health Soc Behav. 2010;51:94-106.
9. Pescosolido B. Of pride and prejudice:the role of sociology and social networks in integrating the health sciences. J Health Soc Behav. 2006;47(3):189-208.
10. Leicht KT, Fenell ML, Witkowski KM. The effects of hospital characteristics and radical organizational change on the relative standing of health care professions. J Health Soc Behav. 1995;36(2):151-67.
11. Machado M. Sociología de las profesiones:un nuevo enfoque. Educ Med Salud. 1991;25(1):28-36.
12. Battistella R, Burchfield D. Rolling back third-party intrusions in the practice of medicine. Physician Exec. 2000;26(6):46-51.
13. Goldenberg MJ. A response to Sestini's (2011) response. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17:1004-5. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01737.x
14. Michel I. The epistemology of evidence-based medicine. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:145-51. DOI:10.1007/s00464-006-0905-7
15. Hafferty FW, Light DW. Professional dynamics and the changing nature of medical work. J Health Soc Behav. 1995;(Extra issue):132-53.
16. Hjorland B. Evidence-based practice:an analysis based on the philosophy of science 1. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2011;67(7):130-110. DOI:10.1002/asi.21523
17. Loughlin M. Reason, reality and objectivity –shared dogmas and distortions in the way both 'scientistic'and 'postmodern'commentators frame the EBM debate. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008;14:665-71.
18. Hafferty FW, Castellani B. Medical sociology. En:Bryant CD, Peck DL, editores. 21st century sociology:a reference handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage;2007. 331-8.
19. Nishijima Y, Blima L. El poder médico y la crisis de los vínculos de confianza en la medicina contemporánea. Salud Colect. 2016;12(1):9.
20. Jarillo-Soto E, Chapela-Mendoza MC, Mendoza-Rodríguez JM. Repercusiones de los nuevos sistemas de pago profesionales en la profesión y la formación médica. Reencuentro. 2005;44. Disponible en:http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=34004408
21. Nigenda G. ¿Médicos en riesgo?Análisis comparativo de tres países. Rev Mex Sociol. 1993;55(3):203-23.
22. Couburn D. Professionalization and proletaranization:medicine, nursing and chiropractic in historial perspective. Labout-Travail. 1994;34:139-62.
23. Haug MR. A re-examination of the hypothesis of physician deprofessionalization. Milbank Q. 1988;66(2):48-56.
24. Tousijn W. Beyond decline:consumerism, managerialism and the need for a new medical professionalism. Health Sociol Rev. 2006;15(5):469-80.
25. Borracci A. La medicina basada en la seducción y la comunicación al público de temas médicos. Rev Argent Cardiol. 2006;75(5):316-7.
26. Freidson E. The reorganization of the professions by regulation. Law Hum Behav. 1983;7:279. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044529
Article Sidebar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain their copyright and grant the Revista Médica del IMSS the right of first publication. Articles are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows sharing as long as the author and the original source are properly credited.
María del Pilar González-Amarante, <p>Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, Campus Monterrey, Escuela de Gobierno y Ciencias Sociales, Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias Sociales. Monterrey, Nuevo León</p>
Profesora de la Escuela de Medicina y la Escuela de Ciencias Sociales del Tec de Monterrey.
Médica, máster en ética aplica y doctora en Ciencias Sociales.