Interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction in women

Authors

  • Ana Silvia Vidal-Brandt <p>Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro M&eacute;dico Nacional Siglo XXI, Hospital de Especialidades, Servicio de Urolog&iacute;a. Ciudad de M&eacute;xico, M&eacute;xico.</p> http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0946-7374
  • Patricia Castro-Núñez <p>Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro M&eacute;dico Nacional Siglo XXI, Hospital de Especialidades, Servicio de Urolog&iacute;a. Ciudad de M&eacute;xico, M&eacute;xico.</p> http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1708-3159
  • Immer Noyola-Ávila <p>Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro M&eacute;dico Nacional Siglo XXI, Hospital de Especialidades, Servicio de Urolog&iacute;a. Ciudad de M&eacute;xico, M&eacute;xico.</p> http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8370-5898
  • Uziel Rodríguez-Muñoz <p>Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro M&eacute;dico Nacional Siglo XXI, Hospital de Especialidades, Servicio de Urolog&iacute;a. Ciudad de M&eacute;xico, M&eacute;xico.</p> http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4570-3186
  • Efraín Maldonado-Alcaraz <p>Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro M&eacute;dico Nacional Siglo XXI, Hospital de Especialidades, Servicio de Urolog&iacute;a. Ciudad de M&eacute;xico, M&eacute;xico.</p> http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4308-2662
  • Jorge Moreno-Palacios <p>Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro M&eacute;dico Nacional Siglo XXI, Hospital de Especialidades, Servicio de Urolog&iacute;a. Ciudad de M&eacute;xico, M&eacute;xico.</p> http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9994-4922

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/

Keywords:

Obstrucción de salida vesical, mujeres, Urodinamia, estudio de proceso

Abstract

Background: The diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) in women is a challenge for functional urology. In Mexico there are few data that report the prevalence of OTSV in women, being up to 24% in a group of patients.

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare six different definitions of bladder outlet obstruction and evaluate the interobserver agreement in an educational setting.

Material and methods: Urodynamic studies (UDS) of women with and without diagnosis of BOO were retrospectively assesed. Farrar, Chassagne, Lemack, Defreitas, Blavais and Groutz, Solomon-Greenwell definitions were evaluated. All UDS were independently reviewed by 5 observers. The easiest, the hardest and the fastest were chosen. Interobserver agreement to classify the patients as obstructed was assessed by kappa reliability statistical analysis. We classified the type of mistakes the participants made; error of interpretation and miscalculation.

Results: A total of 28 urodynamic studies were reviewed. All observers had a substantial agreement (0.64-0.78) to classify BOO using all but Lemack and Solomon-Greenwell definitions. A total 120 errors from 840 responses were found; 45.8% errors of interpretation of UDS and 54.1% miscalculation of the equation. Finally, all the participants chose the Solomon-Greenwell was the most difficult definition.

Conclusion: Chassagne, Defreitas and Farrar definitions proved substantial interobserver agreement. Solomon-Greenwell and Lemack´s definitions had the highest number of pitfalls and the lowest level of agreement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Referencias: 

1.- Gonzalez MR, Flores CO, Velazquez CP, Martínez EC, Márquez RA, Aquino HJ. Prevalencia de disfunción de vaciado vesical y hallazgos clínico-urodinámicos en dos unidades uroginecológicas. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2005;73:596-603.

 

2.- Pang KH, Campi R, Arlandis S, Bo K, Chapple CR, Costantini E, et al. Diagnostic Tests for Female Bladder Outlet Obstruction: A Systematic Review from the European Association of Urology Non-neurogenic Female LUTS Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol Focus. 2021; S2405-4569(21)00231-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.09.003.

3.- Haylen BT, De Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al.  An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(1):5-26. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-009-0976-9

4.- Panicker JN, Anding R, Arlandis S, Blok B, Dorrepaal C, Harding C, et al. Do we understand voiding dysfunction in women? Current understanding and future perspectives: ICI-RS 2017. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(S4):S75-S85. DOI: 10.1002/nau.23709

5.- Chassagne S, Bernier PA, Haab F, Roehrborn CG, Reisch JS, Zimmern PE. Proposed cutoff values to define bladder outlet obstruction in women. Urology. 1998;51(3):408-411. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00634-1

6.- Lemack GE, Zimmern PE. Pressure flow analysis may aid in identifying women with outflow obstruction. J Urol. 2000;163(6):1823-1828.

 

7.- Defreitas GA, Zimmern PE, Lemack GE, Shariat SF. Refining diagnosis of anatomic female bladder outlet obstruction: comparison of pressure-flow study parameters in clinically obstructed women with those of normal controls. Urology. 2004;64(4):675-679; discussion 679-681.

8.- Blaivas JG, Groutz A. Bladder outlet obstruction nomogram for women with lower urinary tract symptomatology. Neurourol Urodyn. 2000;19(5):553-564. DOI: 10.1002/1520-6777(2000)19:5<553::aid-nau2>3.0.co;2-b

9.- Solomon E, Yasmin H, Duffy M, Rashid T, Akinluyi E, Greenwell TJ. Developing and validating a new nomogram for diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction in women. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(1):368-378. DOI: 10.1002/nau.23307

10.- Farrar DJ, Osborne JL, Stephenson TP, Whiteside CG, Weir J, Berry J, et al. A urodynamic view of bladder outflow obstruction in the female: factors influencing the results of treatment. Br J Urol. 1975;47(7):815-822. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1975.tb04062.x

11.- Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-174.

12.- Rosier P, Schaefer W, Lose G, Goldman HB, Guralnick M, Eustice S, et al. International Continence Society Good Urodynamic Practices and Terms 2016: Urodynamics, uroflowmetry, cystometry, and pressure-flow study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(5):1243-1260. DOI: 10.1002/nau.23124

13.- Lindsay J, Solomon E, Nadeem M, Pakzad M, Hamid R, Ockrim J, et al. Treatment validation of the Solomon-Greenwell nomogram for female bladder outlet obstruction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020;39(5):1371-1377. DOI: 10.1002/nau.24347

14.- Whiteside JL, Hijaz A, Imrey PB,  Barber MD, Paraiso MF, Rackley RR, et al. Reliability and agreement of urodynamics interpretations in a female pelvic medicine center. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(2):315-323. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000227778.77189.2d

15.- Rivera CA, Castro NP, Serrano BE,  Hidalgo IH,  Maldonado AE,  Moreno PJ. Nomograma de Zimmern como prueba diagnóstica en mujeres con disfunción del vaciamiento vesical y tratadas mediante esfinterotomía anteromedial. Bol Col Mex Urol 2021; 36: 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24245/bcmurol.6752

 

16.- Zimmern P, Nager CW, Albo M, Fitzgerald MP, McDermott S. Urinary Incontinence Treatment N. Interrater reliability of filling cystometrogram interpretation in a multicenter study. J Urol. 2006;175(6):2174-2177. doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00343-0

 

Downloads

Published

2023-09-18

Issue

Section

Original Articles