Clinicopathological characteristics of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 1+ cases in breast cancer
Main Article Content
Keywords
Breast Neoplasms, Gene Amplification, College of American Pathologists, Immunohistochemistry
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The expression of the HER2 oncogene has a specific prognostic and therapeutic objective in breast cancer care. Low gene expression, called HER2-low implies the possibility of being a candidate for targeted therapy. However, there is significant variability in its interpretation, hence the importance of emphasizing its proper identification and reporting.
Objective: To estimate the proportion of cases confirmed as HER2 1+ among biopsies previously reported as HER2 1+, and to describe their clinicopathological characteristics, as well as the interobserver agreement in their classification.
Materials and methods: Observational, retrospective, and analytical study of cases previously diagnosed as HER2-negative score 1+, which were reviewed by 2 independent pathologists.
Results: 351 cases were included, with a mean age of 59.56 years. The histological subtypes were invasive ductal carcinoma NOS (70.66%), histological grade 2 (56.92%), and SBR score 6 (41.82%), associated in 89.17% of cases with hormone receptor expression. There was agreement for the HER2-low diagnosis in 78.91% of cases, with a Cohen’s kappa simple of 0.62, which is similar to some studies documented in the literature.
Conclusions: Agreement in the interpretation of HER2-low increases when it is performed by at least 2 pathologists; likewise, proper handling of surgical specimens in the pre-analytical phase is vital for optimal assessment, as this has a direct impact on current prognosis and treatment.
References
1. Haddad GE, Diab E, Hajjar M, et al. Insights into the emerging entity of HER2-low breast cancer. Int J Breast Cancer. 2024;2024:2853007. doi: 10.1155/2024/2853007
2. Dieci MV, Miglietta F. HER2: a never-ending story. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(8):1051-2. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00349-1
3. Atallah NM, Toss MS, Green AR, et al. Refining the definition of HER2-low class in invasive breast cancer. Histopathology. 2022;81(6):770-85. doi: 10.1111/his.14780
4. Crespo J, Sun H, Wu J, et al. Rate of reclassification of HER2-equivocal breast cancer cases to HER2-negative per the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines and response to anti-HER2 therapy. PLoS One. 2020;15(11):e0241775. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241775
5. Marchiò C, Annaratone L, Marques A, et al. Evolving concepts in HER2 evaluation in breast cancer: heterogeneity, HER2-low carcinomas and beyond. Semin Cancer Biol. 2021;72:123-35. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.02.016
6. Perron M, Wen HY, Hanna MG, et al. HER2 immunohistochemistry in invasive micropapillary breast carcinoma: complete assessment of an incomplete pattern. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021;145(8):979-87. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0288-OA
7. Allison KH, Krishnamurti U. Template for reporting results of biomarker testing of specimens from patients with carcinoma of the breast. Northfield (IL): College of American Pathologists; 2025 Mar. Version 1.6.0.0. Disponible en: https://documents.cap.org/documents/New-Cancer-Protocols-March-2025/Breast.Bmk_1.6.0.0.REL.CAPCP.pdf
8. Rüschoff J, Friedrich M, Nagelmeier I, et al. Comparison of HercepTest™ mAb pharmDx (Dako Omnis, GE001) with Ventana PATHWAY anti-HER-2/neu (4B5) in breast cancer: correlation with HER2 amplification and HER2 low status. Virchows Arch. 2022;481(5):685-94. doi: 10.1007/s00428-022-03378-5
9. Modi S, Jacot W, Yamashita T, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-low advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022;387:9-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2203690
10. Schnitt SJ, Tarantino P, Collins LC. The American Society of Clinical Oncology-College of American Pathologists Guideline Update for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2023;147(9):991-2. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0187-ED
11. Shirman Y, Lubovsky S, Shai A. HER2-low breast cancer: current landscape and future prospects. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2023;15:605-16. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S366122
12. Buza N, Euscher ED, Matias-Guiu X, et al. Reproducibility of scoring criteria for HER2 immunohistochemistry in endometrial serous carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2021;34(6):1194-202. doi: 10.1038/s41379-021-00746-5
13. Tarantino P, Viale G, Hu X, et al. ESMO expert consensus statements on the definition, diagnosis and management of HER2-low breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2023;34(8):645-59. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.05.008
14. Schettini F, Chic N, Brasó-Maristany F, et al. Clinical, pathological and PAM50 gene expression features of HER2-low breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021;7(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41523-020-00208-2
15. Baez-Navarro X, van Bockstal MR, Nawawi D, et al. Interobserver Variation in the Assessment of Immunohistochemistry Expression Levels in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: Can We Improve the Identification of Low Levels of HER2 Expression by Adjusting the Criteria? An International Interobserver Study. Mod Pathol. 2023;36(1):100009. doi: 10.1016/j.modpat.2022.100009
16. Cárdenas Sánchez J, Bargalló Rocha JE, Cervantes Sánchez G, et al. Consenso Mexicano sobre diagnóstico y tratamiento del cáncer mamario. Décima revisión. Colima (México): Consenso Mexicano sobre Diagnóstico y Tratamiento del Cáncer Mamario; 2023.
17. Wolff AC, Somerfield MR, Dowsett M, et al. Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: ASCO-College of American Pathologists Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(22):3867-72. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02864
18. Zhang G, Ren C, Li C, et al. Distinct clinical and somatic mutational features of breast tumors with high-, low-, or non-expressing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status. BMC Med. 2022;20:142. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02346-9
19. Ahn S, Woo JW, Lee K, et al. HER2 status in breast cancer: changes in guidelines and complicating factors for interpretation. J Pathol Transl Med. 2020;54(1):34-44. doi: 10.4132/jptm.2019.11.03
20. Fernandez AI, Liu M, Bellizzi A, et al. Examination of Low ERBB2 Protein Expression in Breast Cancer Tissue. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8(4):1-4. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.7239
21. Agostinetto E, Rediti M, Fimereli D, et al. HER2-Low Breast Cancer: Molecular Characteristics and Prognosis. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(11):2824. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112824
22. Feldman D, Sinberger LA, Salmon-Divon M, et al. Impact of the OncotypeDX score and HER2 RNA PCR levels on HER2-low IHC levels in primary and metastasized tumors. BMC Cancer. 2023;23(1):1031. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11530-w
23. Tarantino P, Jin Q, Tayob N, et al. Prognostic and Biologic Significance of ERBB2-Low Expression in Early-Stage Breast Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8(8):1177-1183. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.2286
24. Denkert C, Seither F, Schneeweiss A, et al. Clinical and molecular characteristics of HER2-low-positive breast cancer: pooled analysis of individual patient data from four prospective, neoadjuvant clinical trials. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(8):1151-61. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00301-6
25. Bardia A, Hu X, Dent R, et al. Trastuzumab Deruxtecan after Endocrine Therapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2024;391(22):2110-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2407086
26. Zhang L, Wang Y, Meng W, et al. Cardiac safety analysis of anti-HER2-targeted therapy in early breast cancer. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):14312. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18342-1
27. Ivanova M, Porta FM, D'Ercole M, et al. Standardized pathology report for HER2 testing in compliance with 2023 ASCO/CAP updates and 2023 ESMO consensus statements on HER2-low breast cancer. Virchows Arch. 2024;484(1):3-14. doi: 10.1007/s00428-023-03656-w
28. Venetis K, Crimini E, Sajjadi E, et al. HER2 Low, Ultra-low, and Novel Complementary Biomarkers: Expanding the Spectrum of HER2 Positivity in Breast Cancer. Front Mol Biosci. 2022;9:834651. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.834651
