Glycemic control of type 2 diabetes: primary care pre-pandemic versus COVID-19 pandemic

Main Article Content

Guadalupe Soto-Estrada https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1343-2016
Yolanda Mares-Gutiérrez https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3408-878X
Manuel García-Minjares https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9535-5917
Adrián Martínez-González https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5021-9639
Adrián Israel Martínez-Franco https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4631-5425

Keywords

Primary Health Care, COVID-19, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Abstract

Background: Keeping an adequate glycemic control is a major global challenge. Approximately 42% of individuals achieve the recommended HbA1c targets.


Objective: To compare glycemic control in 2 independent cohorts of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in primary care in Mexico City.


Material and methods: Analytical observational study; records of 3598 patients with 2 HbA1c determinations (2562 pre-pandemic and 1036 pandemic) from 213 health units were analyzed. Means, proportions, and t and chi-squared tests were calculated; metabolic control was defined as HbA1c ≤ 8%.


Results: Mean HbA1c was 9.1% in both groups in the first measurement; at the last measurement, it was lower in the pre-pandemic group (8.0% vs. 8.3%; p < 0.001). The percentage of controlled patients increased from 38.5% to 58.5% pre-pandemic and from 37.8% to 54.2% during the pandemic (p = 0.017). Dual oral therapy achieved the greatest increase in control (22.5% pre-pandemic, 28.3% pandemic); isolated insulin therapy and absence of pharmacological treatment were less effective under pandemic conditions.


Conclusions: The pandemic was associated with lower glycemic control; however, regimens with 1 or 2 oral antidiabetic agents retained their effectiveness. Ensuring continuity of care, drug supply, and support for lifestyle measures will be crucial in future crises.

Abstract 52 | PDF (Spanish) Downloads 51

References

1. World Health Organization. Diabetes. Fact sheets. Geneva: WHO; 14 November 2024. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/diabetes

2. Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 11th edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;157:107843. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843

3. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas 2024. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; 2024. Disponible en: https://diabetesatlas.org/

4. Parker ED, Lin J, Mahoney T, et al. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2022. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(1):26-43. doi: 10.2337/dci23-0085

5. Centro Nacional de Excelencia Tecnológica en Salud. Prevención, diagnóstico, metas de control ambulatorio y referencia oportuna de la diabetes mellitus tipo 2 en el primer nivel de atención: Guía de referencia rápida. México: CENETEC; 2019. Disponible en: https://www.cenetec-difusion.com/CMGPC/GPC-SS-093-19/ER.pdf

6. NORMA Oficial Mexicana NOM-015-SSA2-2010, Para la prevención, tratamiento y control de la diabetes mellitus. México: Diario Oficial de la Federación; 2010. Disponible en: https://www.dof.gob.mx/normasOficiales/4215/salud/salud.htm

7. Basto-Abreu A, Barrientos-Gutiérrez T, Rojas-Martínez R, et al. Prevalencia de diabetes y descontrol glucémico en México: Resultados de la Ensanut 2016. Salud Publica Mex. 2020;62(1):50-9. doi: 10.21149/10752

8. Calixto AAS, Franco LJ, La Banca Barber RO, et al. Glycemic outcomes of people with diabetes mellitus in Brazilian primary health care. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries. 2024;44(1):91-98. doi: 10.1007/s13410-023-01203-6

9. Elgart JF, Silvestrini C, Prestes M, et al. Drug treatment of type 2 diabetes: Its cost is significantly associated with HbA1c levels. International Journal of Clinical Practice. 2019;73(4):e13336. doi: 10.1111/IJCP.13336

10. Rossaneis MA, de Andrade SM, Gvozd R, et al. Fatores associados ao controle glicêmico de pessoas com diabetes mellitus. Cien Saude Colet. 2019;24(3):997-1005. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232018243.02022017

11. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. Estadísticas a propósito del Día Mundial de la Diabetes (14 de noviembre). Datos nacionales. Comunicado de prensa núm. 645/21. México: INEGI; 2022.

12. Montoya A, Gallardo-Rincón H, Silva-Tinoco R, et al. Type 2 diabetes epidemic in Mexico: Burden of disease 1990-2021 analysis and implications for public policies. Gac Med Mex. 2024;159(6):488-500. doi: 10.24875/gmm.m24000835

13. Shamah-Levy T, Romero-Martínez M, Barrientos-Gutiérrez T, et al. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2021 sobre COVID-19: Resultados nacionales. Cuernavaca: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública; 2021.

14. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Guía de práctica clínica GPC diabetes mellitus tipo 2 en el primer nivel de atención evidencias y recomendaciones catálogo maestro de guías de práctica clínica: gpc-IMSS-718-18. México: IMSS; 2018. Disponible en: http://imss.gob.mx/profesionales-salud/gpc

15. Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research? Indian J Psychol Med. 2013;35(2):121-6. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.116232

16. Mares-Gutiérrez Y, Gallardo-Hernández A, Lazcano-Ponce E, et al. Descontrol glucémico: desafío de salud pública en prepandemia y pandemia. Salud Publica Mex. 2023;65(3):227-35. doi: 10.21149/14425

17. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. Glycemic targets: Standards of medical care in diabetes—2022. Diabetes Care. 2022;45(Suppl 1):S83-96. doi: 10.2337/dc22-s006

18. Department of Veterans Affairs & Department of Defense. VA/DoD clinical practice guideline for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. 2023. Disponible en: https://www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/CD/diabetes/VADoD-Diabetes-CPG_Final_508.pdf

19. Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Genuth S, et al. Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(24):2545-59. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa0802743

20. Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, Kansagara D, et al. Hemoglobin A1c targets for glycemic control with pharmacologic therapy for nonpregnant adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a guidance statement update from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2018;168(8):569-76. doi: 10.7326/m17-0939

21. Gajate-Martín J, Villoch Salgueiro L, Fernández Manchado E, et al. Impacto de la pandemia de COVID-19 en el control glucémico de pacientes diabéticos tipo 2 en un centro de salud urbano. Med Gen Fam. 2023;12(4):149-53. doi: 10.24038/mgyf.2023.037

22. Biamonte E, Pegoraro F, Carrone F, et al. Weight change and glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients during COVID-19 pandemic: The lockdown effect. Endocrine. 2021;72(3):604-10. doi: 10.1007/s12020-021-02739-5

23. Patel SY, McCoy RG, Barnett ML, et al. Diabetes care and glycemic control during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(10):1412-4. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.3047

24. Vilanova CDDA, Sporquio NG, Barcelos LdQ, et al. Glycemic Control in People With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Seen in Primary Care During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Research Square; 2023. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2996049/v1.

25. Morales RDP, González-Cantú A, Garza-Silva A, et al. Effect of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: A 5-year cohort follow-up managed by a dynamic multidisciplinary team in Northeastern Mexico. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2024;16:94. doi: 10.1186/s13098-024-01318-8

26. Formiga F, Franch-Nadal J, Rodríguez L, et al. Inadequate glycaemic control and therapeutic management of adults over 65 years old with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Spain. J Nutr Health Aging. 2017;21(10):1365-70. doi: 10.1007/s12603-017-0869-4

27. Hernández Arroyo MJ, Díaz Madero A, Enríquez Gutiérrez E, et al. Control glucémico en pacientes diabéticos tipo 2 de edad avanzada: Intervención para evitar riesgos. Med Fam SEMERGEN. 2020;46(7):457-63. doi: 10.1016/j.semerg.2020.01.006

28. Laiteerapong N, Ham SA, Gao Y, et al. The Legacy Effect in Type 2 Diabetes: Impact of Early Glycemic Control on Future Complications (The Diabetes & Aging Study). Diabetes Care. 2019;42(3):416-26. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1144

29. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 4. Comprehensive Medical Evaluation and Assessment of Comorbidities: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025. Diabetes Care. 2025;48(Suppl 1):S59-85. doi: 10.2337/dc25-S004