Implementation sciences: Conceptual frameworks and an illustrative example of PRONAM

Main Article Content

Tom McCutchan https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6492-7516
Marlene López-Sánchez https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1996-7209
Rodolfo Rivas-Ruiz https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5967-7222

Keywords

Implementation Science, Clinical Practice Guideline, Program Evaluation, Evidence Based Practice, Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation

Abstract

Abstract


This editorial discusses the “know-do gap” within the healthcare system, where evidence-based research findings often fail to translate into routine clinical practice. It introduces implementation science as a solution, highlighting the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) alongside other frameworks that explain the factors influencing various outcomes in the implementation of evidence-based clinical practice. The methodology employs a brief conceptual application of these frameworks to the National Medical Care Protocols (PRONAM) in Mexico. We believe that the use of these tools will contribute to the successful integration of PRONAM by addressing contextual barriers, facilitators and sustainability. Implementation science empowers decision-makers to deliver effective, high-quality care to patients.

Abstract 378 | PDF (German) Downloads 912 PDF (Spanish) Downloads 1087

References

1. Eccles M, Mittman B. Welcome to Implementation Science. Implement Sci. 2006;1:1. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-1

2. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50

3. Steering Committee for National Working Group on RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework. What is RE-AIM?. Aurora, Colorado, United States: Steering Committee for National Working Group on RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework; 2026. Disponible en: https://re-aim.org/learn/what-is-re-aim/

4. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322

5. Feldstein AC, Glasgow RE. A practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM) for integrating research findings into practice. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008;34(4):228-43. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(08)34030-6

6. Villasís-Keever MA. Protocolos Nacionales de Atención Médica (PRONAM). Rev Mex Pediatr. 2025;92(5):171-3. doi: 10.35366/122095